دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی شماره 125794
ترجمه فارسی عنوان مقاله

جریان خون پایین اندام و میانگین فشار شریان در طول کار ایستاده و نشسته: پیامدهایی برای توصیه های موضعی در محل کار

عنوان انگلیسی
Lower limb blood flow and mean arterial pressure during standing and seated work: Implications for workplace posture recommendations
کد مقاله سال انتشار تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی
125794 2018 6 صفحه PDF
منبع

Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)

Journal : Preventive Medicine Reports, Volume 10, June 2018, Pages 117-122

ترجمه کلمات کلیدی
پست های کار، ایستاده، نشسته پیامدهای عروقی، ناراحتی کمر پای
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی
Work postures; Standing; Sitting; Vascular outcomes; Lower limb discomfort;
پیش نمایش مقاله
پیش نمایش مقاله  جریان خون پایین اندام و میانگین فشار شریان در طول کار ایستاده و نشسته: پیامدهایی برای توصیه های موضعی در محل کار

چکیده انگلیسی

Sit-stand workstations are a popular workplace intervention. Organizations often require a medical professional's guidance for implementation. Therefore, it is important to understand potential negative outcomes associated with standing work, such as lower limb discomfort and peripheral vascular issues. The objective of this study was to compare changes in lower limb discomfort, blood pressure and blood flow accumulation during a light-load repetitive upper limb work task accomplished from seated and standing postures. At the Jewish Rehabilitation Hospital (Laval, Quebec, Canada), 16 participants were outfitted with Laser Doppler Flow (LDF) electrodes to measure blood flow in the lower limb, and a sphygmomanometer to measure lower limb mean arterial blood pressure (MAP). Participants completed simulated work over 34 min in standing and seated conditions. Repeated measures ANOVAs (Posture x Time) were used to assess the differences. There were significant effects for both Posture (p = 0.003) and Time (p = 0.007) for LDF-measured of blood flow accumulation in the soleus and the foot, with a mean increase of 77% blood flow over time in the standing posture, when compared to seated work. There was a significant ‘Posture × Time’ (p = 0.0034) interaction effect and a significant Posture (p = 0.0001) effect for MAP, with higher values in the standing posture by a mean of 37.2 mmHg. Posture had a significant effect (p < 0.001) on lower limb discomfort, with standing posture reporting higher levels. These results suggest that recommendations for using static standing work postures should be tempered, and physicians' guidance on workstation changes should consider the impacts on the lower limb.