دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی شماره 153593
ترجمه فارسی عنوان مقاله

نگرش عمومی نسبت به ناباروری کودک: یک آزمایش تصادفی بر روی ارزیابی ها، گرایش های گوناگون و حمایت از سیاست ها

عنوان انگلیسی
Public attitudes toward child undervaccination: A randomized experiment on evaluations, stigmatizing orientations, and support for policies
کد مقاله سال انتشار تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی
153593 2017 46 صفحه PDF
منبع

Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)

Journal : Social Science & Medicine, Volume 185, July 2017, Pages 127-136

ترجمه کلمات کلیدی
ایالات متحده، واکسیناسیون، دلمشغولی واکسن، استقامت، نگرش عمومی، سیاست، آزمایش جاسازی شده آزمایش ویگنت،
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی
United States; Vaccinations; Vaccine hesitancy; Stigma; Public attitudes; Policy; Survey-embedded experiment; Vignette experiment;
پیش نمایش مقاله
پیش نمایش مقاله  نگرش عمومی نسبت به ناباروری کودک: یک آزمایش تصادفی بر روی ارزیابی ها، گرایش های گوناگون و حمایت از سیاست ها

چکیده انگلیسی

Child undervaccination is a complex public health problem and a contentious social and political issue. Efforts to increase vaccination coverage require understanding how the public evaluates different reasons for child undervaccination, which may influence attitudes, stigmatizing behaviors, and support for vaccination policies. We conducted a vignette experiment with a United States national online sample (n = 1469) to investigate how and why different undervaccination actions shape evaluations (blame, anger, sympathy, differentness, credibility, dangerousness), stigmatizing orientations (social distance, discrimination), and support for particular policies (e.g., research funding, belief exemptions, fines). Each participant was randomly assigned to read one of four vignettes that described a mother who either refused vaccines, delayed vaccines, encountered social barriers to obtaining vaccines, or was up-to-date on vaccines for her child. Compared to the up-to-date condition, each undervaccination action predicted significantly more negative evaluations and stigmatizing orientations. Vaccine refusal was the most negatively appraised. Differences in social distance and discrimination were explained by negative evaluations about the parent. These evaluations and orientations predicted support for a range of policies. Negative parental evaluations were associated with increased support for more severe policies. We discuss the implications of these findings for addressing undervaccination and informing health scholarship on stigma.