دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی شماره 39372
ترجمه فارسی عنوان مقاله

شباهت ها و تفاوت های میان ABC-2 حرکتی و ارزیابی عصبی تکاملی زوریخ در کودکان مبتلا به اختلال هماهنگی رشدی مشکوک

عنوان انگلیسی
Similarities and dissimilarities between the Movement ABC-2 and the Zurich Neuromotor Assessment in children with suspected developmental coordination disorder
کد مقاله سال انتشار تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی
39372 2014 8 صفحه PDF
منبع

Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)

Journal : Research in Developmental Disabilities, Volume 35, Issue 11, November 2014, Pages 3148–3155

ترجمه کلمات کلیدی
ارزیابی عصبی تکاملی زوریخ ؛ اختلال هماهنگی رشدی؛ هماهنگی حرکتی؛ مهارت های حرکتی؛ توانایی های حرکتی
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی
AC, aiming & catching; BA, balance; BOT-2, Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency; CAM, contralateral associated movements; DB, dynamic balance; DCD, developmental coordination disorder; MD, manual dexterity; FM, fine motor adaptive; M-ABC-2, Movement Assessment Battery for Children–Second Edition; PM, pure motor skills; SDS, standard deviation scores; SB, static balance; ZNA, Zurich Neuromotor AssessmentMovement Assessment Battery for Children; Zurich Neuromotor Assessment; Developmental coordination disorder; Motor coordination; Movement skills; Motor abilities
پیش نمایش مقاله
پیش نمایش مقاله  شباهت ها و تفاوت های میان ABC-2 حرکتی و ارزیابی عصبی تکاملی زوریخ در کودکان مبتلا به اختلال هماهنگی رشدی مشکوک

چکیده انگلیسی

An established tool for the assessment of motor performance in children with developmental coordination disorder (DCD) is the Movement-ABC-2 (M-ABC-2). The Zurich Neuromotor Assessment (ZNA) is also widely used for the evaluation of children's motor performance, but has not been compared with the M-ABC-2. Fifty-one children (39 males) between 5 and 7 years of age with suspected DCD were assessed using the M-ABC-2 and the ZNA. Rank correlations between scores of different test components were calculated. The structure of the tests was explored using canonical-correlation analysis. The correlation between total scores of the two motor tests was reasonable (0.66; p < 0.001). However, ZNA scores were generally lower than those of M-ABC-2, due to poor performance in the fine motor adaptive component and increased contralateral associated movements (CAM). The canonical-correlation analysis revealed that ZNA measures components like pure motor skills and CAM that are not represented in the M-ABC-2. Furthermore, there was also no equivalent for the aiming and catching items of the M-ABC-2 in ZNA. The two tests measure different motor characteristics in children with suspected DCD and, thus, can be used complementary for the diagnosis of the disorder.