دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی شماره 44100
ترجمه فارسی عنوان مقاله

تجدید نظر علم برای توسعه پایدار: تعامل بازتابی برای یک تحول پارادایم

عنوان انگلیسی
Rethinking science for sustainable development: Reflexive interaction for a paradigm transformation
کد مقاله سال انتشار تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی
44100 2015 14 صفحه PDF
منبع

Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)

Journal : Futures, Volume 65, January 2015, Pages 72–85

ترجمه کلمات کلیدی
توسعه پایدار - ارزش - علم دگرگون - یادگیری - اخلاق در علوم - شان انسان
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی
Sustainable development; Values; Transformative science; Transdisciplinarity; Learning; Ethics in science; Human dignity
پیش نمایش مقاله
پیش نمایش مقاله  تجدید نظر علم برای توسعه پایدار: تعامل بازتابی برای یک تحول پارادایم

چکیده انگلیسی

If we postulate a need for the transformation of society towards sustainable development, we also need to transform science and overcome the fact/value split that makes it impossible for science to be accountable to society. The orientation of this paradigm transformation in science has been under debate for four decades, generating important theoretical concepts, but they have had limited impact until now. This is due to a contradictory normative science policy framing that science has difficulties dealing with, not least of all because the dominant framing creates a lock-in. We postulate that in addition to introducing transdisciplinarity, science needs to strive for integration of the normative aspect of sustainable development at the meta-level. This requires a strategically managed niche within which scholars and practitioners from many different disciplines can engage in a long-term common learning process, in order to become a “thought collective” (Fleck) capable of initiating the paradigm transformation. Arguing with Piaget that “decentration” is essential to achieve normative orientation and coherence in a learning collective, we introduce a learning approach—Cohn's “Theme-Centred Interaction”—which provides a methodology for explicitly working with the objectivity and subjectivity of statements and positions in a “real-world” context, and for consciously integrating concerns of individuals in their interdependence with the world. This should enable a thought collective to address the epistemological and ethical barriers to science for sustainable development.