دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی شماره 50959
ترجمه فارسی عنوان مقاله

اضطراب و تصمیم گیری های موقتی: اثر سیستم بازداری رفتاری و اثرات تعدیلی اضطراب خصلتی بر روی هر دو اضطراب حالتی و وضعیت اجتماعی اقتصادی

عنوان انگلیسی
Anxiety and intertemporal decision making: The effect of the behavioral inhibition system and the moderation effects of trait anxiety on both state anxiety and socioeconomic status
کد مقاله سال انتشار تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی
50959 2015 6 صفحه PDF
منبع

Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)

Journal : Personality and Individual Differences, Volume 87, December 2015, Pages 236–241

ترجمه کلمات کلیدی
اضطراب خصلتی؛ اضطراب؛ تصمیم گیری های موقتی - سیستم بازداری رفتاری؛ وضعیت اجتماعی و اقتصادی خانواده در دوران کودکی
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی
Trait anxiety; State anxiety; Intertemporal decision making; The behavioral inhibition system; Family socioeconomic status in childhood
پیش نمایش مقاله
پیش نمایش مقاله  اضطراب و تصمیم گیری های موقتی: اثر سیستم بازداری رفتاری و اثرات تعدیلی اضطراب خصلتی بر روی هر دو اضطراب حالتی و وضعیت اجتماعی اقتصادی

چکیده انگلیسی

Based on Gray's theory, which links the behavioral inhibition motivation system (BIS) to the personality trait of “anxiety”, the present study examined whether anxiety (trait vs. state), BIS sensitivity, and family socioeconomic status in childhood (SES) had an interactive or independent impact on intertemporal decision-making processes. The study also investigated whether participants with high trait anxiety had a significantly different choice preference on the immediate but smaller (SS) rewards over the larger but delayed (LL) rewards. Participants (N = 108) were randomly assigned to either the anxiety or the control condition. Results showed that people with a higher BIS score tended to choose less SS rewards. Trait anxiety was found to moderate both state anxiety and childhood SES to influence intertemporal decision processes. We further found high or low trait anxiety significantly influenced people's choice preference. Speculations on the psychological meanings of the findings were discussed from the perspective of biased risk perception. Limitations and implications were also discussed.