قدرت رای دهی واقعی از اعضاء صندوق بین المللی پول بر اساس ادغام و یکپارچگی سیاسی و اقتصادی آنها

The results show that members’ absolute voting power as measured by our indices produces a power distribution different from that of Penrose and Banzhaf power in both directions. The constituencies’ relative voting power is rather close to their IMF voting weights for the case of the simple majority voting and tends to redistribute between constituencies as the threshold number of votes for a decision to be taken increases; thus, for the 85% supermajority, the maximum power share is that of the Netherlands’s constituency and not that of the US’s, as the Banzhaf power index suggests.