دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی شماره 124084
ترجمه فارسی عنوان مقاله

ظرفیت حافظه کاری با تغییر حالت و صداهای انحرافی به طور ناچیزی با حواس پرتی شنوایی ارتباط ندارد

عنوان انگلیسی
Working memory capacity is equally unrelated to auditory distraction by changing-state and deviant sounds
کد مقاله سال انتشار تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی
124084 2017 16 صفحه PDF
منبع

Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)

Journal : Journal of Memory and Language, Volume 96, October 2017, Pages 122-137

ترجمه کلمات کلیدی
حواس پرتی شنوایی، ظرفیت حافظه کاری، اثر صدا نامناسب، ضبط ذهنی، یادآوری سریال،
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی
Auditory distraction; Working memory capacity; Irrelevant sound effect; Attentional capture; Serial recall;
پیش نمایش مقاله
پیش نمایش مقاله  ظرفیت حافظه کاری با تغییر حالت و صداهای انحرافی به طور ناچیزی با حواس پرتی شنوایی ارتباط ندارد

چکیده انگلیسی

The duplex-mechanism account states that there are two fundamentally different types of auditory distraction. The disruption by a sequence of changing auditory distractors (the changing-state effect) is attributed to the obligatory processing of the to-be-ignored information, which automatically interferes with short-term memory. The disruption by a sequence with a single deviant auditory distractor (the deviation effect), in contrast, is attributed to attentional capture. This account predicts that working memory capacity (WMC) is differentially related to the changing-state effect and to the deviation effect: The changing-state effect is assumed to be immune to cognitive control and, thus, to be unrelated to WMC. The deviation effect, in contrast, is assumed to be open to cognitive control and, thus, to be negatively related to WMC. Despite several methodological improvements over previous studies (large sample sizes, a composite measure of WMC, and a direct statistical comparison of the correlations), there was no evidence of a dissociation between the changing-state effect and the deviation effect. WMC was unrelated both to the size of the changing-state effect and to the size of the deviation effect, irrespective of whether simple stimuli (letters, Experiments 1 and 3) or complex stimuli (words and sentences, Experiment 2) were used as auditory distractors. Furthermore, a cross-experimental analysis with a total sample of N = 601 participants disconfirmed the idea that both types of auditory distraction show a differential relationship with WMC. Implications for models of auditory distraction are discussed.