دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی شماره 82905
ترجمه فارسی عنوان مقاله

تصمیم گیری در برون سپاری امنیت اطلاعات: تاثیر شرکت های مکمل و قابل تعویض

عنوان انگلیسی
Decisions making in information security outsourcing: Impact of complementary and substitutable firms
کد مقاله سال انتشار تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی
82905 2017 45 صفحه PDF
منبع

Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)

Journal : Computers & Industrial Engineering, Volume 110, August 2017, Pages 1-12

ترجمه کلمات کلیدی
ارائه دهندگان سرویس های امنیتی تحت مدیریت، سرمایه گذاری امنیت اطلاعات، برون سپاری امنیت اطلاعات، مکمل، قابل تعویض،
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی
Managed security service providers; Information security investment; Information security outsourcing; Complementary; Substitutable;
پیش نمایش مقاله
پیش نمایش مقاله  تصمیم گیری در برون سپاری امنیت اطلاعات: تاثیر شرکت های مکمل و قابل تعویض

چکیده انگلیسی

This paper constructs a contract-theory model to investigate how an MSSP’s (Managed Security Service Provider) operating characteristics of cost efficiency, multiple clients, security externality and firms’ information nature affect the MSSP’s strategic decisions, including the contract structure and the optimum investment level for firms. The analysis shows that firms’ information nature, either complementary or substitutable, plays a crucial role in influencing an MSSP’s decisions. First, the MSSP tends to provider a contract with a lower refund and exert a lower security investment level when the degree of complementation is higher while tending to provider a contract with a higher refund and exert a higher security investment level when the degree of substitution is higher. Second, there is a lot of differences that how the security externality affects the decisions of the MSSP who serves complementary firms and that who serves substitutable firms. Third, the MSSP’s optimum refund (service fee) to complementary firms is greater than firms’ expected loss (expected cost), while the MSSP’s optimum refund (service fee) to substitutable firms is smaller than firms’ expected loss (expected cost). Fourth, serving a smaller number of substitutable firms is more economic for an MSSP while serving complementary firms the more the better. In addition, the optimum contract structures between an MSSP and complementary (and substitutable) firms are discussed in this paper. These findings give some insights that can guide an MSSP to determine an optimum contract structure and investment level for firms. Future research directions are discussed based on the limitations and possible extensions of this study.