دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی شماره 96410
ترجمه فارسی عنوان مقاله

تولید ایده ها و پیشرفت های بین المللی دانش: حفاری عمیق تر به کشورهای در حال ظهور

عنوان انگلیسی
Ideas production and international knowledge spillovers: Digging deeper into emerging countries
کد مقاله سال انتشار تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی
96410 2017 17 صفحه PDF
منبع

Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)

Journal : Research Policy, Volume 46, Issue 10, December 2017, Pages 1738-1754

پیش نمایش مقاله
پیش نمایش مقاله  تولید ایده ها و پیشرفت های بین المللی دانش: حفاری عمیق تر به کشورهای در حال ظهور

چکیده انگلیسی

Research and Development (R&D) activities of emerging countries (EMEs) have increased considerably in recent years. Recent micro studies and anecdotal evidence points to industrialized countries as the sources of knowledge in EMEs. In this context, we examine ideas production and international knowledge spillovers in a panel of 31 EMEs by accounting for six diffusion channels and two types (national versus USPTO) of patent filings. Knowledge spillovers to EMEs accruing from (i) the industrialized world, (ii) the emerging world, (iii) different country and regional groups, (iv) selected bilateral cases, and (v) those within the regional clusters of EMEs, are modeled. Spillovers from the industrialized world appear robust via geographical proximity and disembodied channels only. Other conduits, including trade flows, are either insignificant or not robust. Spillovers from the emerging world are virtually non-existent. Analyses of regional clusters of EMEs do not support any role of language, culture or geographical characteristics in knowledge diffusion. Overall, the breadth and depth of knowledge spillovers to EMEs appear extremely moderate; however, we find pockets (specific countries and certain groups) generating positive spillovers. A carefully choreographed policy focusing on such pockets might be fruitful. We hope that this study (i) complements the micro literature, (ii) furthers the existing macro literature and (iii) provides some new policy insights. Our results are robust to a range of robustness checks, including the estimators – a cointegration approach versus a simple fixed effects OLS estimator.