آشنایی با آزادی و رشد بهره وری در چین: یک مطالعه تجربی از استان های چین
|کد مقاله||سال انتشار||تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی||ترجمه فارسی|
|11754||2011||9 صفحه PDF||سفارش دهید|
نسخه انگلیسی مقاله همین الان قابل دانلود است.
هزینه ترجمه مقاله بر اساس تعداد کلمات مقاله انگلیسی محاسبه می شود.
این مقاله تقریباً شامل 7072 کلمه می باشد.
هزینه ترجمه مقاله توسط مترجمان با تجربه، طبق جدول زیر محاسبه می شود:
- تولید محتوا با مقالات ISI برای سایت یا وبلاگ شما
- تولید محتوا با مقالات ISI برای کتاب شما
- تولید محتوا با مقالات ISI برای نشریه یا رسانه شما
پیشنهاد می کنیم کیفیت محتوای سایت خود را با استفاده از منابع علمی، افزایش دهید.
Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)
Journal : China Economic Review, Volume 22, Issue 3, September 2011, Pages 290–298
This paper investigates the effects of openness on China's regional productivity growth. We build a model of technology diffusion in which follower economies achieve productivity growth by taking advantage of technology spillovers from the world technology frontier. We hypothesize that China's regional productivity growth is a positive function of regional openness and a negative function of the current level of regional productivity. Empirical analysis in this paper focuses on how openness affects productivity growth in the Chinese provinces. We examine two effects of openness on regional productivity growth in China: the direct growth effect and the convergence effect. By using a variety of panel data regression techniques, we show that the direct growth effect of openness is the main effect while the convergence effect is insignificant. The findings of this paper lend strong support to the claim that the opening-up of China promotes the country's economic growth.
Thanks to various economic reforms and the open-door policy since 1978, China achieved rapid economic growth with an average annual rate of over 9% during 1978–2005, the highest in the world in that period. It is widely argued that, to a large extent, China's economic success in the past three decades can be attributed to the country's radical initiatives encouraging openness to foreign trade and inward flows of foreign direct investment (FDI). Before 1978, China was an almost isolated economy and had little foreign trade with the rest of the world. In 1978, however, the Chinese central government formally adopted the “opening-to-the-outside-world” principle as a national policy. Since then, the trade to GDP ratio quadrupled from a mere 8.5% in 1978 to 36.5% in 1999. The country also transformed itself from one with virtually no foreign-invested firms in 1978 to the largest developing-country destination for FDI: by the end of 2005, the accumulated FDI in China was 622 billion US dollars. Does openness promote economic growth? Significant disagreement on this particular question exists although the causal relationship between the two has been the subject of a voluminous literature. Some growth theories suggest that openness to foreign trade raises a country's level of technology. Trade provides access to new technology embodied in imported goods, enlarges the market faced by domestic producers so that they could raise their returns to innovations, and promotes the country's specialization in research-intensive production (Harrison, 1996). However, increased competition from foreign countries may as well discourage innovations of domestic producers by lowering their expected profits. Lucas, 1988, Grossman and Helpman, 1991a, Grossman and Helpman, 1991b, Young, 1991 and Rivera-Batiz and Xie, 1993 show that economic integration, while being able to raise the worldwide growth rate, may adversely affect individual countries even if trading partners have considerably different technologies and endowments (Sarkar, 2007 and Yanikkaya, 2003). Since the early 1980s, through a controlled effort to open up the economy selectively to trade and FDI, China has gradually transformed itself into a major trading nation and FDI recipient in the world. However, the degree of participation in foreign trade varies greatly from one province to another. FDI inflows are also highly unevenly distributed across provinces. In this paper, we take advantage of the large cross-province variation in the degree of openness to investigate its effects on productivity growth (and hence on income growth) across the Chinese provinces. We are interested in how openness affects productivity growth in different regions in China. As will be illustrated by the model of this paper, there are two potential channels through which regional openness may affect regional productivity growth in China. First, openness may have a direct growth effect on China's regional productivity. According to our model, this effect is not associated with the size of the productivity gap between a Chinese region and the world technology frontier. This is an effect of openness that is not directly related to the speed of technology convergence across the Chinese regions. In other words, this effect is a general growth effect of openness on regional productivity that does not directly involve the catch-up tendency of backward regions driven by openness. Second, openness may have a catch-up effect on regional productivity for backward regions. Openness exerts this catch-up effect (or convergence effect) by increasing the speed of productivity (technology) convergence across different regions in China. Productivity growth related to this effect of openness is dependent on the technology gap between a Chinese region and the world technology frontier. Our empirical results in this paper show that the first effect above is the main channel through which openness affects productivity growth across different regions in China while the second effect is insignificant. The rest of this paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we calculate levels of productivity for the Chinese provinces and provide a discussion of cross-province differences in productivity. Our levels accounting and decomposition exercise in this section shows that cross-province differences in growth rates of per worker output are mainly driven by the differences in productivity growth rates across the Chinese provinces. In Section 3, we present our theoretical model on which our subsequent empirical analysis will be based. This theoretical model explicitly distinguishes two different channels through which openness may affect regional productivity. In Section 4, we carry out our econometric analysis and present regression results. Our results show that the direct growth effect of openness is the main effect while the convergence effect of openness is insignificant. In Section 5, we check the robustness of our estimation results, and finally, Section 6 concludes.
نتیجه گیری انگلیسی
The major goal of this paper is to empirically investigate whether and, more importantly, how regional openness has causal effects on regional productivity growth, and whether there is a related conditional convergence in productivity across the Chinese provinces. Our model, in line with the ideas of Lucas (2009), is one about follower economies imitating technological innovations from leader economies. Our hypothesis is that regional productivity growth is a positive function of regional openness and a negative function of the current level of regional productivity. This point is supported by our empirical analysis. Our regressions show that there is a large positive effect of regional openness on regional productivity growth. Our results also show that there exists strong conditional convergence (conditional on the degree of openness as well as on the time-invariant province heterogeneity) in productivity levels across the Chinese provinces. The contribution of this study is twofold. First, in addition to complementing evidence from cross-country studies, this paper adds to the empirical growth literature by presenting evidence specifically from regions within China. Second, the empirical results of this study improve our understanding of the role of openness in regional growth of China. By using a variety of panel data techniques, this study explicitly examines how openness exerts its effects on regional productivity growth in China. The main findings of this study lend strong support to the claim that openness promotes growth in China.