دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی شماره 159143
ترجمه فارسی عنوان مقاله

بهینه سازی سیستم بازتابنده خطی فرسلل با کنتراتور ثانویه برای توزیع شار یکسان در لوله جذب کننده

عنوان انگلیسی
Optimization of solar linear Fresnel reflector system with secondary concentrator for uniform flux distribution over absorber tube
کد مقاله سال انتشار تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی
159143 2017 12 صفحه PDF
منبع

Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)

Journal : Solar Energy, Volume 150, 1 July 2017, Pages 1-12

ترجمه کلمات کلیدی
غلظت خورشید دو مرحله ای، بازتابنده فرنل خطی، متمرکز کننده ثانویه، توزیع شار یکسان خط هدف متغیر
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی
Two-stage solar concentrator; Linear Fresnel reflector; Secondary concentrator; Uniform flux distribution; Variable aim line;
پیش نمایش مقاله
پیش نمایش مقاله  بهینه سازی سیستم بازتابنده خطی فرسلل با کنتراتور ثانویه برای توزیع شار یکسان در لوله جذب کننده

چکیده انگلیسی

Solar linear Fresnel reflectors (LFR) are attractive because of low cost and optimal utilization of land area. They provide high concentration ratio when used in conjunction with secondary concentrators. A pilot plant of LFR system with 154 m2 of primary mirror field installed at Vallipuram, India has been considered for the present analysis. This type of collectors give rise to high variation of solar radiation flux in the circumferential direction of absorber for the cases with fixed aim line of primary mirrors. In the present work, the concept of variable aim lines for primary mirrors is introduced to defocus and spread the radiation flux in a more uniform manner over the absorber. In particular, both the tilt angles and the radii of curvature of the individual Fresnel mirrors are modified to obtain a better flux uniformity. In addition, a novel segmented parabolic secondary concentrator profile has also been developed, which in conjunction with the variable aim line concept leads to a high optical efficiency of 76.4% and a coefficient of flux variation value of 0.13. On the other hand, 74.9% and 70.9% of optical efficiencies along with 0.17 and 0.33 values of coefficient of variation are obtained with more commonly employed compound parabolic concentrator and trapezoidal concentrator profiles respectively.