دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی شماره 73878
ترجمه فارسی عنوان مقاله

برآورد تجربه مجدد شیوع ناتوانی ذهنی خفیف و اختلال مصرف مواد

عنوان انگلیسی
Capture recapture estimation of the prevalence of mild intellectual disability and substance use disorder
کد مقاله سال انتشار تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی
73878 2014 6 صفحه PDF
منبع

Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)

Journal : Research in Developmental Disabilities, Volume 35, Issue 4, April 2014, Pages 808–813

ترجمه کلمات کلیدی
برآورد شیوع؛ اختلال مصرف مواد؛ ناتوانی ذهنی؛ روش تجربه مجدد جذب
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی
Prevalence estimation; Substance use disorder; Intellectual disability; Capture recapture method
پیش نمایش مقاله
پیش نمایش مقاله  برآورد تجربه مجدد شیوع ناتوانی ذهنی خفیف و اختلال مصرف مواد

چکیده انگلیسی

Persons with mild to borderline intellectual disability (MID) have been identified as a group at risk for substance use disorder (SUD). However, prevalence estimates of co-occurring SUD and MID rely largely on single source studies performed in selected samples. To obtain more reliable population estimates of SUD and MID, this study combines data from an Intellectual Disability Facility (IDF), and an Addiction Treatment Centre (ATC) in a semi-rural area in the Netherlands. Capture–recapture analysis was used to estimate the hidden population (i.e., the population not identified in the original samples). Further analyses were performed for age and gender stratified data. Staff members reported on 88 patients with SUD and MID in the IDF (4.0% of the IDF sample) and 114 in the ATC (5.2% of the ATC sample), with 12 patients in both groups. Only strata for males over 30 years provided reliable population estimates. Based on 97 patients in these strata, the hidden population was estimated at 215. Hence the estimated total population of males over 30 years old with MID and SUD was 312 (95% CI 143–481), approximately 0.16% (0.05–0.25%) of the total population of this age and gender group. This illustrates that while patients with co-occurring SUD and MID often receive professional help from only one service provider, single source data underestimate its prevalence, and thus underestimate treatment and service needs. Therefore, population prevalence estimations of co-occurring SUD and MID should be based on combined multiple source data.