دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی شماره 128418
ترجمه فارسی عنوان مقاله

مقایسه دو روش آموزشی (مانکن در مقایسه با نمایش فلیپ چارت) خودآزمایی پستان زنان روستایی: یک مطالعه مداخله ای

عنوان انگلیسی
Comparison of two training techniques (mannequin versus flip-chart presentation) of breast self examination of rural women: An interventional study
کد مقاله سال انتشار تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی
128418 2018 13 صفحه PDF
منبع

Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)

Journal : Journal of Cancer Policy, Volume 15, Part A, March 2018, Pages 1-4

ترجمه کلمات کلیدی
نئوپلاسمهای پستان، خودآزاری برست مانکن کنترل قبل از â ؟؟ پس از مطالعات، آموزش سلامت، انکولوژی پیشگیرانه،
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی
Breast neoplasms; Brest self-examination; Mannequin; Controlled before – after studies; Health education; Preventive oncology;
پیش نمایش مقاله
پیش نمایش مقاله  مقایسه دو روش آموزشی (مانکن در مقایسه با نمایش فلیپ چارت) خودآزمایی پستان زنان روستایی: یک مطالعه مداخله ای

چکیده انگلیسی

Breast self-examination (BSE) is an important component of any program for the early detection of breast cancer. The present study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the mannequin based approach on BSE practices through a community based quasi-experimental study with a control group. A sample size of 109 rural women was selected for the interventions. Data was collected using an interview schedule before and after the interventions. The knowledge about risk factors for breast cancer was present in around half of the women which is appreciable considering the rural setting. Some misconceptions were present as well. Two third of the participants accepted that BSE is important for them, about one third of the women believed that they will be able to perform BSE effectively and only one-fourth had ever done BSE in their life time. The most common reason reported for not performing BSE was not being aware of BSE. The mannequin based training led to a higher increase in the knowledge, attitude and practice scores as compared to the flip-chart based training but the difference was not statistically significant.