دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی شماره 158719
ترجمه فارسی عنوان مقاله

نمایندگی کودکان نمای دیدگاه فضایی دیگر: استراتژی های مختلف برای دیدگاه های مختلف؟

عنوان انگلیسی
Childrens representations of another persons spatial perspective: Different strategies for different viewpoints?
کد مقاله سال انتشار تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی
158719 2017 17 صفحه PDF
منبع

Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)

Journal : Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, Volume 153, January 2017, Pages 57-73

ترجمه کلمات کلیدی
دیدگاه فضایی، استفاده استراتژیک، توسعه، چرخش ذهنی ذهنی، استراتژی معکوس، فرزندان،
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی
Spatial perspective taking; Strategy use; Development; Mental self-rotation; Inverting strategy; Children;
پیش نمایش مقاله
پیش نمایش مقاله  نمایندگی کودکان نمای دیدگاه فضایی دیگر: استراتژی های مختلف برای دیدگاه های مختلف؟

چکیده انگلیسی

The current study investigated development and strategy use of spatial perspective taking (i.e., the ability to represent how an object or array of objects looks from other viewpoints) in children between 8 and 12 years of age. We examined this ability with a task requiring children to navigate a route through a model city of wooden blocks from a 90° and 180° rotated perspective. We tested two hypotheses. First, we hypothesized that children’s perspective-taking skills increase during this age period and that this process is related to a co-occurring increase in working memory capacity. Results indeed showed clear age effects; accuracy and speed of perspective-taking performance were higher in the older age groups. Positive associations between perspective-taking performance and working memory were observed. Second, we hypothesized that children, like adults, use a mental self-rotation strategy during spatial perspective taking. To confirm this hypothesis, children’s performance should be better in the 90° condition than in the 180° condition of the task. Overall, the results did show the reversed pattern; children were less accurate, were slower, and committed more egocentric errors in the 90° condition than in the 180° condition. These findings support an alternative scenario in which children employ different strategies for different rotation angles. We propose that children mentally rotated their egocentric reference frame for 90° rotations; for the 180° rotations, they inverted the left–right and front–back axes without rotating their mental position.