دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی شماره 44692
ترجمه فارسی عنوان مقاله

اولویت بندی جایگزین ها در ارزیابی زیست محیطی استراتژیک (SEA) با استفاده از روش VIKOR با روش نمونه گیری تصادفی برای شکاف داده ها

عنوان انگلیسی
Prioritizing alternatives in strategic environmental assessment (SEA) using VIKOR method with random sampling for data gaps
کد مقاله سال انتشار تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی
44692 2015 7 صفحه PDF
منبع

Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)

Journal : Expert Systems with Applications, Volume 42, Issue 22, 1 December 2015, Pages 8550–8556

ترجمه کلمات کلیدی
ارزش زیست محیطی - سمی بودن محیط زیست - چشم انداز و زمین شناسی - تجزیه و تحلیل تصمیم گیری چند معیاره - ارزیابی زیست محیطی استراتژیک - روش VIKOR - کیفیت آب
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی
Ecological value; Environmental toxicity; Landscape and geology; Multicriteria decision analysis; Strategic environmental assessment; VIKOR method; Water quality
پیش نمایش مقاله
پیش نمایش مقاله  اولویت بندی جایگزین ها در ارزیابی زیست محیطی استراتژیک (SEA) با استفاده از روش VIKOR با روش نمونه گیری تصادفی برای شکاف داده ها

چکیده انگلیسی

This study suggests a framework to prioritize the plans in strategic environmental assessment (SEA) with incomplete information. The Monte Carlo method for the data gaps in SEA and the VIseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) method, which is a multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) method, are used. The VIKOR method is used to prioritize the plans based on a number of decision criteria because its decision philosophies, considering both the utility and regret of performance measures in MCDA, support the main objective of SEA, which is to minimize potential negative impacts and maximize potential positive impacts of plans. In this study, the proposed framework is applied to the SEA that is part of the long-term plan for dam construction in Korea. This study quantifies the environmental feasibility scores of ten alternative dam construction sites based on multiple criteria, including landscape and geology, ecological value, water quality, and environmental toxicity, and generates sets of random numbers to fill the gaps resulting from the incomplete data. By varying the importance between the regret and utility of performance measures, the rankings of feasible sites are quantified with the uncertainty bounds from the randomly generated numbers. We find that the resulting ranks among the sites can vary significantly according to the decision philosophy of stakeholders. Our results imply that the proposed framework can be utilized to provide quantitative information for decision making in SEA, considering various decision criteria pertaining to environmental aspects, uncertainty of incomplete data, and decision flexibility according to decision-makers’ tendency.