دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی شماره 76735
ترجمه فارسی عنوان مقاله

پویایی زمانی برخورد معقول: تجزیه و تحلیل حقیقت-آینده نگری گزارش کمیسیون عمومی به گذشته و آینده "تروریسم جدید"

عنوان انگلیسی
The temporal dynamics of sensemaking: A hindsight–foresight analysis of public commission reporting into the past and future of the “new terrorism” ☆
کد مقاله سال انتشار تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی
76735 2013 14 صفحه PDF
منبع

Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)

Journal : Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Volume 80, Issue 2, February 2013, Pages 364–377

ترجمه کلمات کلیدی
آینده نگری؛ ادراک؛ کمیسیون عمومی؛ برخرود معقول ؛ تروریسم
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی
Foresight; Hindsight; Public commission; Sensemaking; Sensegiving; Terrorism
پیش نمایش مقاله
پیش نمایش مقاله  پویایی زمانی برخورد معقول: تجزیه و تحلیل حقیقت-آینده نگری گزارش کمیسیون عمومی به گذشته و آینده "تروریسم جدید"

چکیده انگلیسی

The aim of this article is to extend sensemaking theory in public commission reporting by drawing attention to, and demonstrating differences in the temporal dynamics between past and future, hindsight and foresight within the sensemaking/sensegiving processes of two public commission reports. They are The Report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States and The United States Commission into 21st Century Terrorism and National Security Report. Stemming from our analysis of how these commissions make sense of the risk posed by terrorism to national security, we seek to make three contributions. First, we develop sensemaking/sensegiving concepts in public commission reporting by theorizing about hindsight–foresight temporal dynamics. In particular, we extend existing sensemaking scholarship on public commission reporting by directing attention towards the important, yet under-scrutinized role that these inquiries have in sensemaking about the future. Second, we extend the presuppositions underpinning sensemaking theory by operationalizing concepts of antenarrative and employing them in our comparative analysis of the two reports. Third, we contribute to practice by illustrating empirically some of the ‘tactics’ that can be used for challenging hindsight about the known past for the purpose of improving foresight about an unknown future.