دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی شماره 90053
ترجمه فارسی عنوان مقاله

معنی دار و کارآمد؟ چالش های پایدار به مشارکت بومیان در ارزیابی محیط زیست

عنوان انگلیسی
Meaningful and efficient? Enduring challenges to Aboriginal participation in environmental assessment
کد مقاله سال انتشار تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی
90053 2017 11 صفحه PDF
منبع

Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)

Journal : Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Volume 65, July 2017, Pages 164-174

ترجمه کلمات کلیدی
ارزیابی زیست محیطی، مشارکت بومیان، مشارکت بومیان، مشاوره، مشارکت معنادار، بهره وری،
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی
Environmental assessment; Aboriginal participation; Indigenous involvement; Consultation; Meaningful participation; Efficiency;
پیش نمایش مقاله
پیش نمایش مقاله  معنی دار و کارآمد؟ چالش های پایدار به مشارکت بومیان در ارزیابی محیط زیست

چکیده انگلیسی

This paper explores the underlying practice-based challenges to meaningful and efficient Aboriginal participation in environmental assessment (EA) - participation that provides meaningful opportunities for Aboriginal communities to shape EA, yet assures a degree of efficiency for project proponents who need to obtain EA approvals in a timely and financially viable manner. We do so based on an analysis of the EA policy community's experience with uranium exploration and mining in Saskatchewan, Canada. Many of the challenges to meaningful and efficient Aboriginal participation that emerged are multi-dimensional, often concerning participation processes, decision-making, and relationships. Although scholars have explored many of these issues and have proposed numerous solutions, challenges persist in practice. Several other issues also emerged from our study that have received limited attention, including the non-commitment to early and ongoing participation by smaller project proponents, and the EA exemption of exploration projects; the limited availability of information to project developers on local right holders and Aboriginal interests; expectations about the integration of traditional knowledge and land use in EA not aligning with the information that is available to proponents; confusion about who is responsible for initiating early participation and consultation processes; the lack of early relationship building with potentially affected communities, particularly by governments; and the lack of other viable avenues, outside EA, for Aboriginal communities to raise more strategic issues of concern that affect traditional lands and treaty rights.