دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی شماره 123814
ترجمه فارسی عنوان مقاله

بررسی اولیه پاسخ سندرم متابولیک به مصاحبه انگیزشی برای کاهش وزن در مقایسه با کنترل توجه و مراقبت های معمول در مراقبت های اولیه برای افراد مبتلا به و بدون اختلال خوردن غذا

عنوان انگلیسی
Preliminary examination of metabolic syndrome response to motivational interviewing for weight loss as compared to an attentional control and usual care in primary care for individuals with and without binge-eating disorder
کد مقاله سال انتشار تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی
123814 2017 6 صفحه PDF
منبع

Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)

Journal : Eating Behaviors, Volume 26, August 2017, Pages 108-113

ترجمه کلمات کلیدی
سندرم متابولیک، مصاحبه انگیزشی، چاقی، مراقبت های اولیه، اختلال در خوردن غذا، کاهش وزن،
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی
Metabolic syndrome; Motivational interviewing; Obesity; Primary care; Binge eating disorder; Weight loss;
پیش نمایش مقاله
پیش نمایش مقاله  بررسی اولیه پاسخ سندرم متابولیک به مصاحبه انگیزشی برای کاهش وزن در مقایسه با کنترل توجه و مراقبت های معمول در مراقبت های اولیه برای افراد مبتلا به و بدون اختلال خوردن غذا

چکیده انگلیسی

Motivational interviewing (MI) treatment for weight loss is being studied in primary care. The effect of such interventions on metabolic syndrome or binge eating disorder (BED), both highly related to excess weight, has not been examined in primary care. This study conducted secondary analyses from a randomized controlled trial to test the impact of MI for weight loss in primary care on metabolic syndrome. 74 adult participants with overweight/obesity recruited through primary care were randomized to 12 weeks of either MI, an attentional control, or usual care. Participants completed measurements for metabolic syndrome at pre- and post-treatment. There were no statistically significant differences in metabolic syndrome rates at pre-, X2(2) = 0.16, p = 0.921, or post-, X2(2) = 0.852, p = 0.653 treatment. The rates in metabolic syndrome, however, decreased for MI (10.2%) and attentional control (13.8%) participants, but not for usual care. At baseline, metabolic syndrome rates did not differ significantly between participants with BED or without BED across treatments. At post-treatment, participants with BED were significantly more likely to meet criteria for metabolic syndrome than participants without BED, X2(1) = 5.145, p = 0.023, phi = 0.273. Across treatments, metabolic syndrome remitted for almost a quarter of participants without BED (23.1%) but for 0% of those with BED. These preliminary results are based on a small sample and should be interpreted with caution, but they are the first to suggest that relatively low intensity MI weight loss interventions in primary care may decrease metabolic syndrome rates but not for individuals with BED.