دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی شماره 162007
ترجمه فارسی عنوان مقاله

طراحی و تجزیه و تحلیل مکانیزم های تکمیل مشترک غیر متمرکز

عنوان انگلیسی
Design and analysis of mechanisms for decentralized joint replenishment
کد مقاله سال انتشار تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی
162007 2017 11 صفحه PDF
منبع

Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)

Journal : European Journal of Operational Research, Volume 259, Issue 3, 16 June 2017, Pages 992-1002

ترجمه کلمات کلیدی
نظریه بازی، فهرست، دوباره پر کردن مشترک، مدل سفارش قیمت اقتصادی، طراحی مکانیسم،
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی
Game Theory; Inventory; Joint replenishment; Economic Order Quantity model; Mechanism design;
پیش نمایش مقاله
پیش نمایش مقاله  طراحی و تجزیه و تحلیل مکانیزم های تکمیل مشترک غیر متمرکز

چکیده انگلیسی

We consider jointly replenishing multiple firms that operate under an EOQ like environment in a decentralized, non-cooperative setting. Each firm’s demand rate and inventory holding cost rate are private information. We are interested in finding a mechanism that would determine the joint replenishment frequency and allocate the joint ordering costs to these firms based on their reported stand-alone replenishment frequencies (if they were to order independently). We first provide an impossibility result showing that there is no direct mechanism that simultaneously achieves efficiency, incentive compatibility, individual rationality and budget-balance. We then propose a general, two-parameter mechanism in which one parameter is used to determine the joint replenishment frequency, another is used to allocate the order costs based on firms’ reports. We show that efficiency cannot be achieved in this two-parameter mechanism unless the parameter governing the cost allocation is zero. When the two parameters are same (a single parameter mechanism), we find the equilibrium share levels and corresponding total cost. We finally investigate the effect of this parameter on equilibrium behavior. We show that properly adjusting this parameter leads to mechanisms that are better than other mechanisms suggested earlier in the literature in terms of fairness and efficiency.