اولویت بندی ویژگی های مهندسی استقرار گسترش کارکرد کیفیت با اطلاعات ناقص: روش سفارش مشتقات جزئی خطی
|کد مقاله||سال انتشار||تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی||ترجمه فارسی|
|7019||2004||15 صفحه PDF||سفارش دهید|
نسخه انگلیسی مقاله همین الان قابل دانلود است.
هزینه ترجمه مقاله بر اساس تعداد کلمات مقاله انگلیسی محاسبه می شود.
این مقاله تقریباً شامل 7711 کلمه می باشد.
هزینه ترجمه مقاله توسط مترجمان با تجربه، طبق جدول زیر محاسبه می شود:
- تولید محتوا با مقالات ISI برای سایت یا وبلاگ شما
- تولید محتوا با مقالات ISI برای کتاب شما
- تولید محتوا با مقالات ISI برای نشریه یا رسانه شما
پیشنهاد می کنیم کیفیت محتوای سایت خود را با استفاده از منابع علمی، افزایش دهید.
Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)
Journal : International Journal of Production Economics, Volume 91, Issue 3, 18 October 2004, Pages 235–249
Quality function deployment (QFD) has been used as the concurrent engineering tool to save the production cost and time. It is not easy to get information or knowledge for the prioritization of customer attributes and engineering characteristics during the QFD planning process. This research suggests a linear partial ordering approach for assessing the knowledge from participants and prioritizing engineering characteristics. The linear partial information will be used in extracting weights of customer attributes and relationship values of customer attributes between engineering characteristics. Using the linear partial ordering can reduce the cognitive burden of designers and engineers of QFD planning team. Four types of dominance relation that are frequently used in multi-attribute decision making with incomplete information are used to determine the priorities of engineering characteristics when the linear partial orderings of participants are given. The dominance relations between engineering characteristics can be established by solving a series of linear programming problem.
Many firms are facing rapid changes stimulated by technological innovations and changing customer demand. These firms realize that getting high-quality products to customer in a timely manner is crucial for their survival in the competitive marketplace. Product development process is a complex managerial process that involves multi-functional groups with different perspectives. Quality function deployment (QFD) is a new product development process which stresses cross-functional integration. QFD ensures quality throughout each stage of the product development and production process. QFD was originally developed and used in Japan at the Kobe Shipyards of Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. in 1972. QFD has been used successfully by Japanese manufacturers of customer electronics, home appliances, construction equipment, synthetic rubber, textile, software system, etc. Akao (1990) and Hauser and Clausing (1998) introduced basics of QFD process and a lot of successful cases of QFD. Also, Cohen (1995) explains the detailed process of QFD and provides several applications of QFD. Govers (2001) emphasized that special attention must be paid to product policy and cross functional project approach to make QFD a valuable technological and organizational aid for innovation projects. During the 1980s and 1990s many kinds of US companies began employing QFD after the initial success at Fuji-Xerox in 1983. Many successful cases across a broad range of industries have been reported until now. During the QFD planning process, product design team needs to know how to make a selection of design features. Due to the complexity of decision process, the design team will often rely upon ad hoc procedures to assist in this product development (Wasserman, 1993). Such procedures are often completely “arbitrary”, however, and subject to the “whims” of the design team rather than to the need of customer (Franceschini and Rossetto, 1995). As many researchers have pointed out, more convenient methodology is needed to get information from design team and provide an unforced evaluation of the QFD tables. This paper proposes a methodology for prioritizing engineering characteristics in QFD with incomplete information. The methodology uses a linear partial ordering to assess the knowledge and information from QFD team and apply the MADM method to derive priorities or weights of engineering characteristics. The linear partial information will be used in extracting weights of customer attributes and relationship values between customer attributes and engineering characteristics. And then, dominance relations in multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) procedure with linear partial information are used to derive the priorities of engineering characteristics. The dominance relations between engineering characteristics can be established by solving a series of linear programming problem. Due to the easiness in articulating preferential information, using linear partial information can reduce the cognitive burden of designers and engineers of QFD planning team and give a practical convenience in using QFD planning process. The remainder of this article is organized as follows. Section 2 includes the definition of QFD and short review of the prior researches in QFD, and explains the necessity of incomplete information. Five types of linear partial information will be introduced and discussed in Section 3. Also, a methodology based on MADM and incomplete information will be developed to prioritize engineering characteristics in Section 3. An illustrative example is shown in Section 4.
نتیجه گیری انگلیسی
Although QFD planning has been widely used for product design problem and other areas, assessing information from participants is still difficult process in QFD planning. Proposed methodology uses linear partial ordering to assess information in QFD. Especially, using the linear partial information makes it possible that the participants easily provide various types of information. In extracting information or knowledge of participants in QFD planning process, using linear partial information can reduce cognitive burden of designers and engineers. Based on the dominance concepts of MADM with incomplete information, we develop a methodology for prioritizing engineering characteristics and explain the methodology with an example. Although solving a number of LPs and computational complexity are major drawbacks of the methodology, development of computer program, like decision support system, and development of computer technology will overcome the drawbacks. Applying the methodology to real world problem, and then comparing the result with the result of traditional methodology will be an interest topic for further research. Also, applying to various application fields of QFD will be expected.