استفاده از اطلاعات وفناوری اطلاعات در یک سازمان دولتی در یک کشور در حال توسعه: یک مطالعه تجربی
|کد مقاله||سال انتشار||تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی||ترجمه فارسی|
|18084||2008||15 صفحه PDF||سفارش دهید|
نسخه انگلیسی مقاله همین الان قابل دانلود است.
هزینه ترجمه مقاله بر اساس تعداد کلمات مقاله انگلیسی محاسبه می شود.
این مقاله تقریباً شامل 7940 کلمه می باشد.
هزینه ترجمه مقاله توسط مترجمان با تجربه، طبق جدول زیر محاسبه می شود:
- تولید محتوا با مقالات ISI برای سایت یا وبلاگ شما
- تولید محتوا با مقالات ISI برای کتاب شما
- تولید محتوا با مقالات ISI برای نشریه یا رسانه شما
پیشنهاد می کنیم کیفیت محتوای سایت خود را با استفاده از منابع علمی، افزایش دهید.
Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)
Journal : The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Volume 17, Issue 2, June 2008, Pages 140–154
eGovernment initiatives all over the world endeavor to integrate Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) to transform delivery of government services to their stakeholders by improving quality of services, accountability and efficiency. In this study we explore adoption of ICT to enhance government-to-employee interactions in a government organization in a developing country. We examine this adoption behavior by utilizing the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) that provides an integrative view of user acceptance. We found that performance and effort expectancy, social influence and facilitating conditions all positively impact the use of the ICT. We did not find a significant moderating effect of gender on these relationships
In recent years, growth of the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) has had a substantial impact on the way local, state and national governments function. Information and Communication Technology (ICT) refer to technologies such as the Internet, Intranets, Extranets, ERP and other such technologies that cover the spectrum from basic infrastructure implementation to technologies that improve services and operations in an organization. Use of ICT in government, popularly known as eGovernment, is on the rise with 19% of all government organizations worldwide offering online services (West, 2005). eGovernment is described as the use of technology to enhance access to, and delivery of, government services to benefit citizens, business partners and employees at local, municipal, state and national levels (Grant and Chau, 2005, Gronlund and Horan, 2005, Ke and Wei, 2004 and Turban et al., 2002). eGovernment has been defined using various perspectives. Tung and Rieck (2005) defined it as the use of ICT to enhance public administration processes. Lee et al. (2005) described eGovernment with respect to mainly building better government-to-consumer (G2C) interactions, akin to the function of Customer Relationship Management (CRM) in the business sector. Ke and Wei (2004) described eGovernment as the use of Internet technology to enable greater interaction between government organizations and its citizens. Digital government or eGovernment, often used interchangeably, is not just putting public services online – it is about government harnessing information technology in order to remain relevant in a more interactive and informational era (Tapscott and Agnew, 1999). Based on the interactions of a government organization with other stakeholders, eGovernment has been classified as interactions with internal clients and citizens (G2C), government-to-business (G2B), government-to-internal employees (G2E), government-to-other institutional government organizations (G2G) and citizen-to-citizen (C2C) (Carter and Belanger, 2003 and Tan et al., 2005). Carter and Belanger (2003) emphasized the use of ICT to improve efficiency and access to government services across all stakeholders in G2C, G2E, G2G and G2B services. eGovernment implementation can result in significant benefits such as improved efficiencies, greater access to services, greater accountability, transparency and citizen empowerment (Lam, 2005 and Tung and Rieck, 2005), lowered costs and time for services (Bhatnagar, 2000 and Gilbert et al., 2004), strategic advantages such as improved decision making through streamlining of information, enhanced knowledge sharing and organizational learning, improved interactions with citizens, other government organizations and businesses and industry, leveraging market forces for better relationships between government and private sectors, and greater ability to effect organizational change management (Grant and Chau, 2005, Tung and Rieck, 2005 and Zhang et al., 2005). Tolbert and Mossberger (2006) reported that increased use of eGovernment by citizens also lead to increased trust in local government and also in positive attitudes towards eGovernment processes. Thus eGovernment in a broader perspective encompasses all the key factors of governance – better delivery of government services to citizens, improved interaction with business and industry, employee and citizen empowerment through access to information, and more efficient management, i.e., the use of ICT to transform delivery of government services. ICT is an integral part of successful eGovernment implementation including G2G. Prattipati (2003) reported that there is wide variance in the adoption of e-governance and use of online government services among countries. Highest use of government online services in 2002 was in Sweden (57% of the population) and lowest use country was Hungary (3%), while India was third lowest (5%). Singapore, which is currently rated as third among all nations in eGovernment ranking (Misra, 2006), is actualizing USD (US Dollars) 14.5 million savings in benefits (Ke and Wei, 2004 and Lee et al., 2005). Recent eGovernment research has focused more on economically developed countries than on developing countries. Most developing countries continue to have poverty alleviation and building of social and technological infrastructure as a priority (Bhatnagar, 2000). Also, developing countries typically have a larger percentage of rural population compared to economically developed countries which present additional difficulties in ICT infrastructure layouts and scaling up of eGovernment initiatives. Chen et al. (2006) noted that despite key differences in technological and social aspects of developed and developing countries, most developing countries have followed best practices and strategies used in eGovernment implementation in developed countries. They summarized the differences between eGovernment in economically developed and developing countries, developed a conceptual framework to analyze implementation strategies in each and demonstrated these using USA and China as a representative country from developed and developing countries, respectively. They highlighted that lessons learned from eGovernment implementations in developed countries could not be transposed to developing countries with complete success. This study focuses on studying the factors that lead to adoption of ICT in a government organization in a economically developing country. We use India as a representative of developing country in the Southeast Asian region. As we note from Table 1, India’s profile as a developing country is close to two other countries, Pakistan and Sri Lanka, in the region in terms of ICT use and Internet use penetration.The National Association of Software and Services Companies (NASSCOM) in India estimated that the e-governance market in India in 2002 was USD 300 million (Giving e-Governance, 2003). In 2005, the market grew to USD 693 million and is expected to further grow to USD 935 million by the end of 2006 (http://www.digitalopportunity.org, 2006). According to NASSCOM estimates, state governments and the Central government in India together spent USD 890 million towards e-governance in 2001–02, a number that is expected to reach USD 6 billion in 2007–08. There are some interesting experiments of e-governance being undertaken at the state level in India, which bear testimony as to how it is being conceived as an important agenda of public administration in India. According to a recently released report, India ranked 77th in the order of eGovernment rankings in 2006 compared to the 59th rank in 2002 despite an increase in its ratings score since 2002 (West, 2006). This indicates that other countries have been much more successful in implementing eGovernment over the last few years compared to India. India may be lagging behind due to poor infrastructure and the slow response to the emerging cyber-culture (Bagga, 2004). In this research, we examine the factors that influence adoption of ICT by employees in a government organization (G2E) in India. We use an integrated model, the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology, also known as the UTAUT model, to evaluate user acceptance of ICT. The research paper is organized as follows: in the next section we present a review of literature on eGovernment and information technology adoption. Then, we propose a research model and hypotheses for this study. In the following section on research methodology, we describe the sample used, and data collection methods. Finally we present our results followed by discussion and conclusions.
نتیجه گیری انگلیسی
Our results show that UTAUT is a valid model to understand the adoption and successful use of ICT in government organizations in developing countries. Information systems analysts and designers should design ICT that are easy to use and directly impact individual and organizational performance. Government organizations also need to pay special attention to providing adequate training and support during implementation and use of such systems. Managers need to provide a facilitating environment where employees are encouraged to use new technologies by clarifying expectations and possible impact on employee job description and workload. This study has its limitations. In this research we investigated the adoption of ICT in a government organization. While eGovernment can include a number of technologies and services, our study is restricted to use of Internet and to one setting – government-to-employee (G2E). We do not explore those services in eGovernment that come under the umbrella of government-to-citizen services. We also did not consider the role of other exogenous factors that could impact the behavioral intention to use and actual use of the system. Despite some of these limitations, we believe this study makes a significant contribution to knowledge in the areas of eGovernment and technology acceptance and adds to the understanding of enabling factors in these areas in developing countries. We can identify some areas of future research. Additional research in government and non-government organizations in different developing countries is required to further examine acceptance and use of Internet technologies. Future research can extend our study to other sectors of governments and see if the factors that we found to be significant in our study are important determinants of Internet technology use in other government organizations. Future research can also examine role of ICT in government-to-citizen (G2C), government-to-business (G2B), and government-to-government (G2G) environments.