متدولوژی MCDM ترکیبی برای مشکل انتخاب ERP با تعامل ضوابط
|کد مقاله||سال انتشار||تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی||ترجمه فارسی|
|13270||2012||9 صفحه PDF||سفارش دهید|
نسخه انگلیسی مقاله همین الان قابل دانلود است.
هزینه ترجمه مقاله بر اساس تعداد کلمات مقاله انگلیسی محاسبه می شود.
این مقاله تقریباً شامل 6470 کلمه می باشد.
هزینه ترجمه مقاله توسط مترجمان با تجربه، طبق جدول زیر محاسبه می شود:
|شرح||تعرفه ترجمه||زمان تحویل||جمع هزینه|
|ترجمه تخصصی - سرعت عادی||هر کلمه 90 تومان||10 روز بعد از پرداخت||582,300 تومان|
|ترجمه تخصصی - سرعت فوری||هر کلمه 180 تومان||5 روز بعد از پرداخت||1,164,600 تومان|
Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)
Journal : Decision Support Systems, Volume 54, Issue 1, December 2012, Pages 206–214
An enterprise resource planning (ERP) system is an information system to plan and integrate all of an enterprise's subsystems including purchase, production, sales and finance. Adopting such a comprehensive framework may result in the great savings in both costs and man hours. This research explores the application of a hybrid multicriteria decision making (MCDM) procedure for the evaluation of various ERP alternatives. The proposed evaluation framework integrates three methodologies: Analytic Network Process (ANP), Choquet integral (CI) and Measuring Attractiveness by a Categorical Based Evaluation Technique (MACBETH). ANP produces the priorities of alternatives with respect to the interdependent evaluation criteria. The conjunctive or disjunctive behaviors between criteria are determined using MACBETH and CI. Numerical application of the proposed methodology is implemented on the decision making problem of a firm that faces with four ERP projects. The final ranking is compared to the one obtained by ignoring the interactions among criteria. The results demonstrate that the ignorance of the interactions may lead to erroneous decisions.
Due to severe market competition, companies have directed to consider alternative business environments in order to reduce total cost, maximize return on investment, shorten lead times and be more responsive to customer requirements. An enterprise resource planning (ERP) system can be considered as a solution for inefficient business processes. Organizations think about purchasing it when they deal with a number of complex and interrelated business troubles, such as achieving company's financial goals, managing and streamlining the company's operational processes, better forecasting features or obtaining the benefits of improved information management by reducing data duplication. An ERP system typically implements a common enterprise-wide database together with a range of application modules . It standardizes processes and stores information as well as recalls that data when it is required in real time environment. Implementing an ERP system may be costly and time-consuming. Companies spend billions of dollars and use numerous amounts of man-hours for installing elaborate ERP software systems. However, the benefits of a successful ERP project are worthwhile. The offered ERP software packages cannot provide a once-for-all business model for every process of all industries. In other words, no single ERP packaged software can meet all company functionalities or all special business requirements . Thus, companies must choose a flexible ERP system that is responsive to customer requirements. The major reason for ERP implementation failures is stated as the inappropriate system selection  and . An inappropriate selection process can significantly affect not only the implementation but also the performance of the company . Therefore, the importance of selecting a suitable ERP system cannot be overemphasized . This paper introduces a hybrid multicriteria decision making (MCDM) model for ERP selection based on Analytic Network Process (ANP), Choquet Integral (CI) and Measuring Attractiveness by a Categorical Based Evaluation Technique (MACBETH). MCDM refers to find the best opinion from all of the feasible alternatives in the presence of multiple, usually conflicting, decision criteria. It is a branch of a general class of operations research models that deals with the decision making problems under the presence of a number of decision making alternatives described by their attributes . Priority based, outranking, distance-based and mixed methods could be considered as the primary classes of the current methods . One of the most outstanding MCDM approaches is ANP which is a generalization of one of the most known MCDM methodologies: Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) . While AHP represents a framework with a unidirectional hierarchical relationship, ANP allows for complex interrelationships among decision levels and criteria. ANP is used in many decision support systems of various types. Verdecho et al. , have provided a methodology based on ANP to prioritize and manage inter-enterprise performance at both the strategic and the process level. Another research has explored the application of ANP approach for the evaluation of R&D projects that are elements of programs with heterogeneous objectives . Although there are various methods, such as mathematical programming, MCDM analysis or scoring, which is applied to the ERP software selection, we focus on studies including MCDM analysis. Wei et al.  have introduced their selection framework that is based on AHP method. Erensal and Albayrak  have suggested AHP to effectively enhance adoption of macroergonomics and to improve management decision performance in measuring and comparing the overall performance of different management styles based on macroergonomical criteria. The most similar work to our proposed framework is the work of Yazgan et al. . However, they have designed an artificial neural network model and trained with using ANP results in order to calculate ERP software priorities. In our paper, we have categorized ERP selection criteria into three main sets: vendor related criteria (VRC), customer related criteria (CRC), and software related criteria (SRC). Each one consists of its own sub-criteria set. Since these criteria and sub-criteria have both inner and outer dependencies, we have made use of the ANP to determine these dependencies and relative priorities of all criteria. MACBETH is both an approach and a set of techniques that have the goal of providing an overall ordering of options, and that aid on the construction of interval numerical scales based on qualitative (non-numerical) pairwise comparison judgments  and . In this research, we have used CI to determine conjunctive or disjunctive behaviors between criteria and integrated MACBETH in CI in order to define the parameters of CI. The last phase of the proposed methodology involves ranking the given ERP alternatives according to their final performance scores. We have shown the feasibility of the framework on the decision making problem of a company that needs to evaluate four ERP software alternatives and select the most suitable one according to its requirements. Furthermore, we have obtained another ranking by using the same evaluation values; however this time we have ignored the interactions among criteria. The comparison has shown that the final ranking may change dramatically with the ignorance of the interactions and therefore it may lead us to erroneous decisions. The remaining part of the paper is organized as follows: Section 2 describes the methodologies that constitute the proposed framework. The steps and details of the proposed decision support framework are introduced in Section 3. The implementation into the ERP selection problem is presented in Section 4. Finally, Section 5 gives the concluding remarks of the study.
نتیجه گیری انگلیسی
ERP systems have a vital role in today's organizations, however they have high costs and high implementation risks. Therefore, evaluating the offered ERP systems and selecting the most suitable one among them is a challenging task. With the increase in the number of requirements, the selection problem becomes more complex to solve, and the companies need to make their decisions in increasingly complex environments. Our work presents a comprehensive framework for selecting a suitable ERP system based on a hybrid multicriteria decision analysis process. The procedure consists of three methodologies: Analytic Network Process (ANP), Choquet Integral (CI) and Measuring Attractiveness by a Categorical Based Evaluation Technique (MACBETH). We have illustrated the applicability of the framework through a case study of the ERP software selection of a company. The proposed decision making framework is flexible enough to fit other sectors with some specific characteristic changes and to incorporate different criteria in the evaluation process. Besides proposing a hybrid MCDM model for ERP selection problem, what we would also like to underline with this study is the importance of not ignoring the interactions among different elements of a decision model. Moreover as it is discussed in the previous section, we can say that ignoring the interactions may lead us to obtain a different final ranking, hence making a bad decision according to the wrong conclusions.