دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی شماره 46447
ترجمه فارسی عنوان مقاله

مناطق ایتالیایی از نظر خدمات الکترونیکی عمومی چقدر پیشرفته هستند؟ ساخت یک شاخص ترکیبی در تجزیه و تحلیل الگوهای انتشار نوآوری در بخش دولتی

عنوان انگلیسی
How advanced are Italian regions in terms of public e-services? The construction of a composite indicator to analyze patterns of innovation diffusion in the public sector ☆
کد مقاله سال انتشار تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی
46447 2014 16 صفحه PDF
منبع

Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)

Journal : Telecommunications Policy, Volume 38, Issues 5–6, June–July 2014, Pages 514–529

ترجمه کلمات کلیدی
نوآوری در خدمات عمومی - فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات - شاخص ترکیبی - توسعه منطقه ای
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی
Innovation in public services; ICT; Composite indicators; Regional development
پیش نمایش مقاله
پیش نمایش مقاله  مناطق ایتالیایی از نظر خدمات الکترونیکی عمومی چقدر پیشرفته هستند؟ ساخت یک شاخص ترکیبی در تجزیه و تحلیل الگوهای انتشار نوآوری در بخش دولتی

چکیده انگلیسی

This paper applies an open and transparent methodology to construct a composite indicator for the analysis of the diffusion of ICT in the public sector and the development of public e-services across Italian regions. This methodology, based on OECD/EC-JRC Handbook and incorporating experts′ opinion into a Data Envelopment Analysis, will allow us to define a ranking of Italian regions in terms of ICT adoption and of e-service development. Data are obtained by merging four different surveys carried out by Between Co. (2010–2011) and Istat – Italy′s National Bureau of Statistics (2009). We add to extant empirical literature in three ways. First, we offer a comprehensive measurement of advances in digital government that is not circumscribed to a single domain (e.g. administrative procedures of public administrations) but is rather aimed to capture a wide spectrum of public e-services (e-government, e-education, Intelligent Transport Systems, e-health). Second, we tackle a major drawback of existing statistics and benchmarking studies which are largely based on the count of services provided online, by including more sophisticated indicators on the quality of services offered and on back office changes. The results – both in terms of scores and regional rankings – highlight the presence of different patterns of adoption and use of public e-services at the local level. Third, we offer a rich account of the extreme heterogeneity of public e-service development and of the underlying technological and organizational change at the sub-national level, and hence provide a basis for the differentiating policy measures across regions.