بین المللی سازی و عملکرد: اثر تعدیل یادگیری سازمانی
|کد مقاله||سال انتشار||تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی||ترجمه فارسی|
|3989||2008||18 صفحه PDF||سفارش دهید|
نسخه انگلیسی مقاله همین الان قابل دانلود است.
هزینه ترجمه مقاله بر اساس تعداد کلمات مقاله انگلیسی محاسبه می شود.
این مقاله تقریباً شامل 10184 کلمه می باشد.
هزینه ترجمه مقاله توسط مترجمان با تجربه، طبق جدول زیر محاسبه می شود:
|شرح||تعرفه ترجمه||زمان تحویل||جمع هزینه|
|ترجمه تخصصی - سرعت عادی||هر کلمه 90 تومان||15 روز بعد از پرداخت||916,560 تومان|
|ترجمه تخصصی - سرعت فوری||هر کلمه 180 تومان||8 روز بعد از پرداخت||1,833,120 تومان|
Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)
Journal : Omega, Volume 36, Issue 2, April 2008, Pages 188–205
By proposing a conceptual outline for a general model that explains the internationalization–performance link, we test the moderating effects of organizational learning on the relationship between internationalization and performance empirically. Integrating two distinct literature streams from the organizational learning perspective and the resource-based view, we present an integrated, multidimensional framework for analyzing multinational enterprises’ (MNEs’) resources, internationalization, and organizational learning, as well as their associated impact on firm performance. Specifically, using a sample of 110 American MNEs, we find that while certain MNE resources motivate and precede internationalization, social and market learning (whereas technological learning does not) moderates the relationship between internationalization and performance. These findings extend prior research by establishing the importance of the relationships among MNE resources, internationalization, organizational learning, and firm performance.
Experiential knowledge and organizational learning have become increasingly accepted in the international business literature as pivotal strategic tools that differentiate firm performance , ,  and . Most plausibly, an experiential learning effect arises because, by engaging in international business activities, multinational enterprises (MNEs) acquire knowledge about foreign markets and operations, which enables them to overcome the challenges of unfamiliarity with foreign markets and the potential liability of foreignness. In this context, the term “experiential knowledge” embraces all types of knowledge that MNEs accumulate through their activities in international markets and implies their ability to search for, analyze, and act on international issues in both their home and host markets . As such, learning MNEs continuously strive to learn about international markets to achieve a competitive advantage in the global marketplace and, in turn, improve their performance. Despite its importance, little or no research exists about how MNEs’ organizational learning may affect the relationship between internationalization, or the extent to which MNEs conduct business activities beyond their national borders, and firm performance. As a result, little is known about how organizational learning influences the scope and deployment of internationalization and thereby differentiates firm performance. Because of continuing increase in international competition, an investigation of the role of organizational learning offers substantial value and importance to practitioners. Moreover, an investigation of the role of organizational learning may refine our conceptual understanding of the internationalization–performance link. Although international business scholars have dedicated considerable effort to understand the internationalization–performance relationship, existing literature offers conflicting empirical findings about the performance implications of internationalization. These results include everything from linear (positive, negative, none) to nonlinear (U-shaped, inverted U-shaped, S-shaped) relationships (for a review, see ). Overall, the mixed results pertaining to this link suggest the need for a contingency perspective to explain the relationship. Two calls to resolve this inconclusiveness have attracted serious attention in the recent past. First, Delios and Beamish  and Tallman et al.  question whether internationalization is itself a source of performance difference or simply a consequential byproduct of other antecedents linked to firm-specific resources. Second, Ruigrok and Wagner  and Kotabe et al.  suggest that existing research examining the internationalization–performance link has overlooked potential moderating variables. To answer the first call, we test the internationalization–performance relationship in our model by considering internationalization as an intervening mechanism that aids in the translation of firm resources into performance. More specifically, resources drive internationalization and that, in turn, has a positive impact on firm performance. In response to the second call, this study investigates organizational learning as a moderator in the internationalization–performance relationship. The objectives of this paper therefore are to (1) examine the link among resources, internationalization, and performance and (2) investigate the moderating role of organizational learning in the internationalization–performance link. We attempt to make three contributions. First, by studying the moderating role of organizational learning, we seek to extend knowledge about the role of organizational learning in influencing the effectiveness of a firm's international business activities. Second, this research addresses existing knowledge gaps by analyzing the influence of resource-based antecedents on internationalization. In other words, we consider the antecedents (e.g., product advantage, resources available for an international expansion) of internationalization and posit that they are core enablers (whereas organizational learning is a moderator) of the relationship between internationalization and firm performance. Third, in addition to testing theory, we offer useful guidelines for managers who are looking for theoretical explanations of the nature of the relationships among antecedents, internationalization, organizational learning, and performance. The rest of the article is organized as follows: the next section briefly reviews the background literature. The third section develops a conceptual framework of the moderating role of organizational learning on the internationalization–performance link and derives several research hypotheses that are based on an integration of a wide array of literature. The fourth section describes the research methodology followed to test the hypotheses, and the fifth discusses the results of the data analyses. The article concludes with a delineation of the significance of the findings, managerial implications, and future research directions
نتیجه گیری انگلیسی
This study simultaneously examines (1) the antecedents of internationalization and (2) the contingent relationship between internationalization and performance by introducing organizational learning as a moderator. Specifically, we treat product advantage and the resources available for international expansion as antecedents of internationalization, view organizational learning as a multidimensional concept, and investigate the moderating role of three different types of organizational learning activities. Our results, based on a sample of American MNEs, confirm that product advantage and resources available for international expansion precede internationalization, consistent with previous empirical findings in the international business literature  and . Our results also demonstrate that the internationalization–performance link is moderated by organizational learning activities. Our extension of extant research also indicates that the performance advantages of internationalization are contingent on organizational learning factors such as social and market learning. In particular, the internationalization–performance link is strengthened by social and market learning activities. However, that technological learning does not moderate the link between internationalization and performance. One possible explanation is that market and social ties may be more sensitive to the geographical and cultural diversity created by internationalization, whereas technology is less so. This study reflects the central importance of acquiring foreign country knowledge through organizational learning during international expansion. In line with this discovery, conventional wisdom has shifted from viewing internationalization simply as an economic mechanism that MNEs use to seek extraordinary economic rents to regarding it as an effective conduit that enables MNEs to exploit knowledge gained in multiple foreign markets. As such, learning MNEs continuously strive to learn about foreign countries and transfer their knowledge across borders in the global marketplace. This study offers further support for the idea that MNEs should be treated as knowledge-based entities . Moreover, our research suggests that organizational learning has a strong impact on the internationalization–performance link, such that internationalization pays off better for those MNEs highly involved in organizational learning. Our finding also resonates with Crossan and Inkpen's ,  and  serial discussion of learning in international joint ventures. For example, Inkpen and Crossan  find that international joint venture experience was essential for 40 North American–Japanese ventures in their attempts to exploit learning opportunities and acquire knowledge internationally. To become learning organizations and accomplish knowledge transfers across borders, MNEs must participate actively in the relevant organizational learning activities during their international expansion, which will enable them to enhance their performance. In other words, the link between internationalization and performance is strengthened when firms engage in organizational learning activities.