دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی شماره 41347
ترجمه فارسی عنوان مقاله

مبارزه اژدها با اژدها: رویکردها برای مذاکره با شرکای چینی

عنوان انگلیسی
Fighting dragons with dragons: Approaches for negotiating with Chinese partners
کد مقاله سال انتشار تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی
41347 2013 12 صفحه PDF
منبع

Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)

Journal : Business Horizons, Volume 56, Issue 5, September–October 2013, Pages 561–572

ترجمه کلمات کلیدی
مذاکرات تجاری آمریکا و چین - کسب و کار ایالات متحده و چین - مدیران ایالات متحده - روابط زنجیره تامین - بینگ فا - حل تعارض
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی
American-Chinese business negotiations; U.S.-China business; U.S. managers; Supply chain relationships; Bing Fa; Conflict resolution
پیش نمایش مقاله
پیش نمایش مقاله  مبارزه اژدها با اژدها: رویکردها برای مذاکره با شرکای چینی

چکیده انگلیسی

For many American firms engaging with Chinese business partners, patterns of negotiated promises made but not kept by their Chinese counterparts often prove rule rather than exception. While various issues play a role in this unfortunate condition, many contributing factors are not subject to control or correction by U.S. negotiators. But two singularly damaging factors can be controlled and corrected by U.S. managers. First is their tendency to negotiate from decidedly Western sociocultural perspectives. Second is that managers often negotiate in states of relative ignorance about certain key cultural values that heavily influence Chinese negotiating practices. Grounded in Bing Fa, this article describes approaches designed to enable managers to negotiate more effectively with Chinese partners. By turns, the approaches instruct U.S. managers regarding why and how they should (when negotiating with Chinese counterparts): embrace the unusual as normal; begin with hard ends in mind; anticipate/prepare for conflict; never resist resistances, [instead] always retreat gracefully; disclose with discretion; act like ladies and gentlemen; and never die with bullets in [their] guns. Adopt these tactics, and U.S. managers would lessen the impact of two factors that, when present, degrade their negotiating effectiveness.