ارزیابی اکسرژیک برای سیستم اقتصادی زیست محیطی: کشاورزی چینی
|کد مقاله||سال انتشار||تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی||ترجمه فارسی|
|8617||2009||14 صفحه PDF||سفارش دهید|
نسخه انگلیسی مقاله همین الان قابل دانلود است.
هزینه ترجمه مقاله بر اساس تعداد کلمات مقاله انگلیسی محاسبه می شود.
این مقاله تقریباً شامل 10331 کلمه می باشد.
هزینه ترجمه مقاله توسط مترجمان با تجربه، طبق جدول زیر محاسبه می شود:
Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)
Journal : Ecological Modelling, Volume 220, Issue 3, 10 February 2009, Pages 397–410
Based on the thermodynamic concept of exergy as a unified measure for environmental resources and economic products, a framework for systems assessment is presented for ecological economies. With a typical systems diagram devised for a general ecological economy with four arm fluxes for free local natural resources, purchased economic investment, environmental impact and economic yield, system indices of the renewability index, exergy yield ratio, exergy investment ratio, environmental resource to yield ratio, system transformity and environmental stress index are defined for a congregated systems ecological assessment with essential implications to sustainability. As a detailed case study to the Chinese agriculture from 1980 to 2000 with cropping, forestry, stockbreeding and fishery sectors, extensive exergy account and systems assessment are carried out with emphasis on annual and structural variations against social political transitions. For the overall agriculture as a congregated ecological stage, the value of the system transformity is found around 10, the typical value for the general ecological hierarchy as well devised by Odum associated with Lindeman's Tenth Law.
As an indicator of the distance from thermodynamic equilibrium, exergy provides a unified measure of various forms of materials and energy carriers, and thus qualified as a basic medium used in the bookkeeping to qualify ecological networks of exchange. Due to the scarcity of the cosmic exergy as the fundamental natural resource for the ecosystem of the earth, an exergetic ecology based on the second law of thermodynamics has gained momentum to emerge in the field of systems ecology, as development of and to replace the solar energy-based energetic ecology (Jørgensen and Mejer, 1981, Schneider and Kay, 1994a, Schneider and Kay, 1994b, Jørgensen et al., 1995, Jørgensen et al., 2000, Ulanowicz and Abarca-Arenas, 1997, Valero, 1998, Fath et al., 2001, Fath et al., 2004, Jørgensen and Fath, 2004, Szargut, 2004, Chen, 2005, Chen, 2006, Ulanowicz et al., 2006 and Jørgensen, 2006). Instead of solar energy as usually supposed, the cosmic exergy due to the thermal difference between the solar radiation and the CBM (cosmic background microwave) field has been shown to be the driving force of the earth system, and the scarcity of cosmic exergy availability as the fundamental natural resource for the ecosphere and the human society has been revealed by a systematic study on the global consumption of the cosmic exergy in the earth and a balance of the exergy consumption with respect to main terrestrial processes (Chen, 2005). Anthropogenic utilization of terrestrial exergy defined with reference to the terrestrial environment characteristic of the crust, ocean and atmosphere (Szargut et al., 1988), derived from the cosmic exergy according to the mechanism of multiplication for the case of thermal radiation (Chen, 2005), is therefore the basic physical cause of the global ecological crisis. The systems account of the exergy utilization in the environment and human interacted ecological economy would present a basic vision of a basic stage of the universal exergy hierarchy, on a scale just next to the global, terrestrial and national or regional scales, and the basic systems structure in terms of exergy thus revealed may serve as the basis for the ecological diagnosis of the economy. To optimize the exergy utilization as anthropogenic ecological impact in fundamental biophysical terms is essential for the sustainability associated with an ecological economy. Exergy account for natural resources has been carried out in various forms (Rosen and Dincer, 1997, Rosen and Dincer, 2001, Rosen and Dincer, 2003, Dincer, 2002a, Dincer, 2002b, Dincer and Rosen, 2005, Dincer and Rosen, 2007 and Erek and Dincer, 2008). The application of the exergy method for a society was initially presented merely for flows of energy carriers for energy use (Reistad, 1975, Rosen and Dincer, 1997 and Ayres et al., 2003). Society exergy account for the use and conversion of natural resources including both energy carriers and materials was introduced by Wall (1977) and carried out for many countries (e.g., Wall, 1990, Rosen, 1992, Schaeffer and Wirtshafter, 1992, Wall et al., 1994, Ertesvåg and Mielnik, 2000, Chen and Chen, 2006a, Chen and Chen, 2006b, Chen et al., 2006a, Chen et al., 2006b, Chen and Chen, 2007a, Chen and Chen, 2007b, Chen and Chen, 2007c, Chen and Chen, 2007d, Chen and Chen, 2007e and Chen and Chen, 2007f). A systems account for societal exergy utilization has been developed towards an exergetic ecology for society, or in another term, exergy-based social ecology (Ertesvåg, 2005 and Chen and Qi, 2007). As a human controlled or at least human interfered ecosystem dependent on environmental resources with production or service goals, an ecological economy is a socio-economic-ecological entity bounded with various dimensions. The diversity of attributes of an ecological economy necessitates systems ecological analysis based on exergy as a unified measure of natural resource, economic investment, environmental impact and industrial product (Wall, 1977, Ayres et al., 1996, Sciubba, 2001, Rosen, 2001, Szargut, 2004, Chen, 2006, Chen and Ji, 2007, Chen et al., 2006a, Chen et al., 2006b and Jiang et al., 2007). Agriculture is a typical ecological economy, dependent on the support from environmental resources in terms of natural resources such as sunlight, wind, water and soil, and of environmental impact due to pollutant emissions, and from the economy with investment of fertilizer, pesticide, fuel, electricity, human labor and service, with economic yield as outcome from sectors such as cropping, forest, stockbreeding and fishery. As a mainstream field for energetic ecology, agriculture has been extensively assessed in terms of material and energy fluxes in general and emergy (embodied solar energy) in particular (e.g., Odum, 1996, Ulgiati and Brown, 1999, Chen et al., 2006a, Chen et al., 2006b and Jiang et al., 2007). With the emergence of exergetic ecology, it is time to fully integrate natural resources, environmental impact, economic investment and economic yield in the agriculture. In the present study, a general framework for exergetic analysis of an ecological economy is proposed and illustrated with a detailed case study for the Chinese agriculture 1980–2000. An exergy systems diagram is presented with arms of economic investment, free natural resource input, environmental impact and economic yield, and a variety of system indicators are illustrated with essential implications to sustainability. Detailed structure of the input/output and system indicators is examined in a historical perspective for the Chinese agriculture.
نتیجه گیری انگلیسی
Based on the thermodynamic concept of exergy as a unified measure for environmental resources and industrial products, a framework for systems assessment is presented for ecological economies. The additivity of exergy as a unified measure for various fluxes involved in an environment and economy combined system and a typical systems diagram devised for a general ecological economy with four arm fluxes for free local natural resources, purchased economic investment, environmental impact and economic yield, system indices of the renewability index, exergy yield ratio, exergy investment ratio, environmental resource to yield ratio, system transformity and environmental stress index are defined for a congregated systems ecological assessment with essential implications to sustainability. As a detailed case study, the Chinese agriculture is analyzed from a historical perspective for the two decades from 1980 to 2000. Concrete methods for exergy estimate are given and extensive exergy account are carried out for all the fluxes of free renewable natural resource (as sunlight, geothermal heat, rain and wind), purchased economic investment (as renewable investment of seeds, labor, organic manure and irrigation water and nonrenewable resources as fossil fuels, electricity, chemical fertilizers, pesticides, plastic mulches and mechanical equipments), environmental emission (due to animal waste, fertilizer, pesticides and plastic mulch) and yield of cropping, forestry, stockbreeding and fishery industries, and systems assessment are carried out with annual variation and structural analysis against social political transitions. Topsoil loss is found to be of the same importance as the economic investment as a whole. Animal wastes account for most of the environmental emission, and the minor pollution sources are fertilizers, pesticides and plastic mulches. For the overall agriculture as a congregated ecological stage, the value of the system transformity is found around 10, the typical value for the general ecological hierarchy as well devised by Odum associated with Lindeman's Tenth Law. For 1 unit of economic investment into the agriculture, it is estimated that there are about 25 units of free natural resource input, 2 units of environmental impact and 3 units of production yield. What the agriculture contributes to the main economy is much more than that the main economy invests into the agriculture. The Chinese agriculture is shown under a transition from the self-supporting tradition dependant on renewable resources to the prevailing pattern of increasing nonrenewable input and heavy environmental impact.