دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی شماره 109471
ترجمه فارسی عنوان مقاله

تعرفه خدمات اکوسیستم مبتنی بر ارزش در مدیریت چند منظوره در جنگل های کوهی اروپا

عنوان انگلیسی
Value-based ecosystem service trade-offs in multi-objective management in European mountain forests
کد مقاله سال انتشار تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی
109471 2017 13 صفحه PDF
منبع

Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)

Journal : Ecosystem Services, Volume 26, Part A, August 2017, Pages 245-257

ترجمه کلمات کلیدی
خدمات محیط زیستی، جنگل های کوهستانی، تجزیه و تحلیل تجاری، شاخص ها، تجزیه و تحلیل چند معیاره،
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی
Ecosystem services; Mountain forests; Trade-off analysis; Indicators; Multi-criteria analysis;
پیش نمایش مقاله
پیش نمایش مقاله  تعرفه خدمات اکوسیستم مبتنی بر ارزش در مدیریت چند منظوره در جنگل های کوهی اروپا

چکیده انگلیسی

Mountain forests provide a diverse range of ecosystem services (ES). In case of conflicting ES, trade-offs must be considered in forest resource planning. In this study, simulation-based scenario analysis and multi-criteria decision analysis is used to analyse expected utilities and value-based trade-offs in multi-objective forest management related to four key ES (timber production, carbon storage, biodiversity conservation, protection against gravitational hazards) in three European mountain regions. In each case study area a set of management alternatives including no-management were simulated over 100 years and ES quantified using ES indicators. Multifunctional goal scenarios are employed to aggregate partial ES utilities, accumulated RMSE between ES are used to quantify trade-offs. In two analysed case study areas no-management generated highest ES utilities for biodiversity conservation, carbon storage and protection against gravitational hazards. Alternatives based on small-scale silviculture combined timber production and biodiversity conservation very well. In all case study areas increasing goal preferences for timber production or biodiversity and nature conservation result in increasing overall trade-offs with rather decreasing overall utilities. In all case study areas the analysed managements support multiple ES and can thus be considered as multifunctional. Based on the presented analysis management alternatives could be further improved.