پیش بینی کارای شاخصهای بازار سهام با استفاده بهینه سازی جستجوی باکتریایی تطبیقی(ABFO) و تکنیکهای مبتنی بر BFO
|کد مقاله||سال انتشار||تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی||ترجمه فارسی|
|16390||2009||8 صفحه PDF||17 صفحه WORD|
- تولید محتوا با مقالات ISI برای سایت یا وبلاگ شما
- تولید محتوا با مقالات ISI برای کتاب شما
- تولید محتوا با مقالات ISI برای نشریه یا رسانه شما
پیشنهاد می کنیم کیفیت محتوای سایت خود را با استفاده از منابع علمی، افزایش دهید.
Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)
Journal : Expert Systems with Applications, Volume 36, Issue 6, August 2009, Pages 10097–10104
2. مبانی BFO و BFO تطبیقی
3. کاربرد BFO و ABFO در پیش بینی بازار سهام
3.1 ارائه مدل پیش بینی بر اساس BFO
جدول 1: شاخصهای فنی انتخاب شده و فرمول آنها
4. مطالعه شبیه سازی
4.1 داده های تجربی
4.2. آموزش و تست مدل پیش بینی
جدول 2: مقایسه MAPE برای شاخص سهام S & P 500 به دست آمده از مدل های مختلف
جدول 3: مقایسه MAPE برای شاخص سهام S & P 500 به دست آمده از مدل های مختلف
5. بحث و نتایج
6. نتیجه گیری
The present paper introduces the use of BFO and ABFO techniques to develop an efficient forecasting model for prediction of various stock indices. The structure used in these forecasting models is a simple linear combiner. The connecting weights of the adaptive linear combiner based models are optimized using ABFO and BFO by minimizing its mean square error (MSE). The short and long term prediction performance of these models are evaluated with test data and the results obtained are compared with those obtained from the genetic algorithm (GA) and particle swarm optimization (PSO) based models. It is in general observed that the new models are computationally more efficient, prediction wise more accurate and show faster convergence compared to other evolutionary computing models such as GA and PSO based models.
Financial forecasting or specifically Stock Market prediction is one of the hottest fields of research due to its commercial applications and the attractive benefits it offers. As more and more money is being invested in the stock market, investors get nervous and anxious of the future trends of the stock prices in the markets. The primary area of concern is to determine the appropriate time to buy, hold or sell. Unfortunately, stock market prediction is not an easy task, because of the fact that stock market indices are essentially dynamic, nonlinear, complicated, nonparametric, and chaotic in nature (Tan, Quek, and Ng, 2005). The time series of these processes are multi-stationary, noisy, random, and has frequent structural brakes (Oh and Kim, 2002 and Wang, 2003). In addition, stock market’s movements are affected by many macro-economical factors (Wang, 2002) such as political events, firms’ policies, general economic conditions, investors’ expectations, institutional investors’ choices, movement of other stock market and psychology of investors. Many research works have been reported in the field of stock market prediction across the globe. Generally there are three schools of thoughts regarding such prediction. The first school believes that no investor can achieve above average trading advantages based on historical and present information. The major theories include the random walk hypothesis and the efficient market hypothesis (Peters, 1996). Taylor (1986) in his paper has provided compelling evidence to reject the random walk hypothesis and therefore researchers have been encouraged to suggest better models for market price prediction. The second view is that of fundamental analysis. Analysts have undertaken in-depth studies into the various macro-economic factors and have looked into the financial conditions and results of the industry concerned to discover the extent of correlation that might exist with the changes in the stock prices. Technical analysts have presented the third view on market price prediction. They believe that there are recurring patterns in the market behavior, which can be identified and predicted. In the process they have used number of statistical parameters called technical indicators and charting patterns from historical data. However, these techniques have often yielded contradictory results due to heavy dependence on human expertise and justification. The recent trend is to develop adaptive models for forecasting financial data. These models can be broadly divided into statistical models and soft-computing models. One of the well known statistical methods is the one based on autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) (Ayeni Babatunde and Pilat, 1992). The recent advancement in the field of soft-computing has given new dimension to the field of financial forecasting. Most artificial neural network (ANN) based models use historical stock index data such as technical indicators (Kim, 2006) to predict future prices. Tools based on ANN have increasingly gained popularity due to their inherent capabilities to approximate any nonlinear function to a high degree of accuracy. Neural networks are less sensitive to error term assumptions and can tolerate noise, chaotic components, and heavy tails better than most other methods (Masters, 1993). The three most popular ANN tools for the task are radial basis function (RBF) (Hann and Kamber, 2001), recurrent neural network (RNN) (Saad, Prokhorov, and Wunsch, 1998) and multilayer perceptron (MLP). More recently, new models based on multi-branch neural networks (MBNN) (Yamashita, Hirasawa, and Hu, 2005), local linear wavelet neural networks (LLWNN) (Chen, Dong, and Zhao, 2005) among others have been reported. The genetic algorithm (GA) has recently been applied (Tan et al., 2005; Kim, 2006) for prediction. Existing literature reveals that very little work has been reported on the use of evolutionary computing tools in training the weights of forecasting of models. Recently a new evolutionary computing technique known as bacterial foraging optimization (BFO) has been reported (Passino, 2002) and successfully applied to many real world problems like harmonic estimation (Mishra, 2005), transmission loss reduction (Tripathy, Mishra, Lai, and Zhang, 2006), active power filter for load compensation (Mishra and Bhende, 2007), power network (Tripathy and Mishra, 2007), load forecasting (Ulagammai, Venkatesh, Kannan, and Padhy, 2007) and independent component analysis (Acharya, Panda, Mishra, and Lakhshmi, 2007). The conventional BFO employs constant run length unit (the step by which the bacteria run or tumble in one go) in updating the location of the bacteria. To improve the optimization performance Takagi–Sugeno fuzzy scheme has been used to adapt the run length unit (Mishra, 2005). However, in Fuzzy-BFO the performance is linked with choice of the membership function and the fuzzy rule parameters and no systematic approach exists to determine these parameters for a given problem. Hence, the Fuzzy-BFO presented in Mishra (2005) is not suitable for optimizing various complex problems. In Mishra and Bhende (2007), a modified BFO proposed in has been used to optimize the coefficients of PI controller for active power filters. This algorithm has been shown to outperform a conventional GA with respect to convergence speed. Tripathy and Mishra (2007) have recently proposed an improved BFO algorithm for simultaneous optimization of the real power losses and voltage stability limit of a mesh power network. Simulation results of their approach shows superior performance compared to the conventional BFO based method. In a recent communication (Ulagammai et al., 2007) the BFO has been applied to train a wavelet neural network (WNN) meant for identifying nonlinear characteristics of power system loads. Acharya et al. (2007) have used the BFO in independent component analysis and have reported that the proppseed method yields better separation performance compared to the constrained genetic algorithm based ICA. To the best of our knowledge none of the existing work has applied the BFO and adaptive BFO algorithms in designing forecasting models for short and long term prediction of stock indices. The present work is a humble contribution in this direction. The present paper has two main objectives. Firstly it aims to develop a new forecasting model for prediction of stock indices using an adaptive linear combiner as the basic structure of the model and the BFO, a promising evolutionary computing tool, for training the parameters of the model. The second objective is to introduce a newly developed simple adaptive BFO (ABFO) technique and apply the same to develop more efficient prediction model for the same purpose. The prediction performance of the new models have been evaluated for short and long term prediction of stock indices and have been compared with those obtained from models based on other evolutionary computing tools such as GA and PSO. The proposed ABFO learning rule provides adaptive runlength in the chemotaxis step which leads to faster convergence during training compared to its BFO counterpart. The organization of the paper proceeds as follows. Section 2 deals with the basic principle of the BFO and ABFO tools employed for training the linear combiner of the models. The BFO and ABFO based model developments for stock market prediction are outlined in Section 3. To demonstrate the prediction performance of the proposed models the simulation study is carried out in Section 4. This section also provides the formulae of computing the technical indicators. The results of simulation are discussed in Section 5. Finally the conclusion of the investigation is provided in Section 6.
نتیجه گیری انگلیسی
In this paper two new forecasting models based on BFO and ABFO are developed to predict different stock indices using technical indicators derived from the past stock indices. The structure of these models are basically an adaptive liner combiner, the weights of which are trained using the ABFO and BFO algorithms. To demonstrate the performance of the proposed models simulation study is carried out using known stock indices and their prediction performance is compared with standard GA and PSO based forecasting models. The comparison indicates that the proposed models offer lesser complexity, better prediction accuracy and faster training compared to those obtained from the GA and PSO based models. Out of the two new models proposed the ABFO model provides best performance in all counts followed by the simple PSO based model.