قیمت های متوالی و تصمیمات کمی ریسک های تحت عرضه و تقاضا
|کد مقاله||سال انتشار||تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی||ترجمه فارسی|
|9378||2013||11 صفحه PDF||سفارش دهید|
نسخه انگلیسی مقاله همین الان قابل دانلود است.
هزینه ترجمه مقاله بر اساس تعداد کلمات مقاله انگلیسی محاسبه می شود.
این مقاله تقریباً شامل 10800 کلمه می باشد.
هزینه ترجمه مقاله توسط مترجمان با تجربه، طبق جدول زیر محاسبه می شود:
- تولید محتوا با مقالات ISI برای سایت یا وبلاگ شما
- تولید محتوا با مقالات ISI برای کتاب شما
- تولید محتوا با مقالات ISI برای نشریه یا رسانه شما
پیشنهاد می کنیم کیفیت محتوای سایت خود را با استفاده از منابع علمی، افزایش دهید.
Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)
Journal : International Journal of Production Economics, Volume 141, Issue 2, February 2013, Pages 541–551
Firms need to deal with not only risks from stochastic demand but also risks from supply side. The supply side risk may be due to parts/service outsourcing, third party logistics, or random yield in production processes. In this paper, we study how firms sequentially make price and quantity decisions under these two risks. The first question we try to answer is how these two risks affect the decisions and profits of the firm. We find that increased supply risk usually causes increased quantity/stocking decision, however, there exists a threshold level of supply risk above which the firm reduces quantity/stocking amount as supply risk increases. This observation may be used in a supply chain setting, where reduction of the supply risk can cause higher delivered quantity and improve supply chain performance. This observation also provides support and insights on prioritizing the risk reduction efforts from marketing and operations to achieve better coordination. At the same time, reduction of the risks help not only firms but also consumers as the optimal price decreases. To further improve decision making process under both uncertainties, we study the impact from information revelation and postponement of decisions. We compare results from different sequential decision making cases. As illustrated in the paper, firms gain competing advantage when decision postponement is available and this advantage becomes further significant as the risks increase. Our numerical examples also indicate that price postponement strategy is usually preferred but the relative profit difference between price postponement and quantity postponement become smaller as consumers become more sensitive to the price.
Marketing and operations are two important functional departments of a company. The operations department usually makes either the replenishment decision or the production decision, which is generally named as the quantity decision in this paper. On the other hand, the prices of the products are usually jointly determined by different departments including marketing and accounting. As in the same firm, these two decisions are usually coordinated so that the market demand determined by the price decision can be satisfied by the supply affected by the quantity decision. In reality, making either decision could be complicated. For the price decision, since it affects the market demand, which is often assumed to be uncertain, the projection of anticipated revenue could be hard. At the same time, the quantity decision (either production or replenishment/procurement decision) affects the availability of the product; and there is always the risk that this availability may vary. This risk from the supply side is usually modeled as random yield risk, which may come from the supply process (i.e., outsourcing), the logistic process or the production process, or more generally, anything that may affect the availability of the products or services at the specified time and at the specified location. To name a few examples, a company will have supply risk due to long lead time, which usually causes higher lead time variability and supply uncertainty; or a company's supply may be affected by the reliability of its 3PL company; or a manufacturer may have the traditionally defined production yield randomness. These two risks from the market demand and the supply side interact and jointly affect the company's profitability. The first goal of this paper is to address the optimal price and quantity decisions under both the demand risk and the supply risk and study how the two risks jointly influence the firm. Furthermore, under this joint decision context and due to products or logistics characteristics, the firm may choose different sequences on the price and quantity decisions. The second goal of this paper is to study the sequential decision making under uncertainties. There are mainly two situations, quantity decision before price decision, and price decision before quantity decision. Examples for each situation can be found in reality. Specifically, for the sequential decision cases: 1. Pricing decision is made before the operational decision. This happens when the demand information is crucial for the supply chain due to its high volatility and the production/supply lead time is relatively short and reliable. The typical example of this type of products is the fashion goods market like clothing and fashion accessory, etc. The firm would like to gain more market information before making the production or quantity decision. Therefore, under this situation, the firm usually decides the price first and observes the market preliminary response, then the firm determines the operational strategy to satisfy this demand. This is referred as the quantity postponement strategy. Pre-order events for products like video games, fashion goods, or popular books are typical examples of quantity decision postponement. 2. Operational decision is made before the pricing decision. This often happens when the demand is relatively stable but the supply/production takes long lead time, for example, the consumer goods and durable goods in Walmart imported from Asia to North America, or variety of agriculture products which take more than months to grow. Due to the characteristics of the products, the demand variation is usually small but the supply risk may be high due to the long lead time. In this case, the operational planning is more important for the firm to achieve lower cost. The motivation of sequential decision is the benefit from the information revelation, in particular, demand and yield information revelation in the two cases above. Therefore, coming with the sequential decision making, a natural question to explore is how the decision postponement helps the firm and how the information revelation benefits the firm in each sequential decision case. The joint price and quantity decision problem, especially the simultaneous decision making problem, have been extensively studied in the literature. Either multiplicative or additive demand form is assumed to reflect the price sensitive demand. This stream of research focuses on finding the optimal price and quantity decisions under different supply chain settings and different operational or marketing restrictions. Most papers show the benefit from flexible pricing option. Petruzzi and Dada (1999) give a general review on this simultaneous decision problem. Under both demand forms, Petruzzi and Dada (1999) study the price and quantity decisions in the single period and multiple period settings and show the optimal strategies. They also discuss the effect of flexible pricing on improving the firm's performance, which is also discussed in our paper. Furthermore, Transchel and Minner (2009) discuss the impact of dynamic pricing under EOQ quantity decision. The property of the timing for price changes is characterized and the benefit from this dynamic pricing is discussed. A recent paper by Chen et al. (2012) study three manufacturer's pricing strategies for operational planning. They suggest that warranties have become a popular measure for encouraging market demand by reducing risks for consumer. Therefore, consumers intend to be risk-averse and treat warranties as compensation paid to consumers in event of product failure. Wang et al. (2009) extend the joint decision model by using the expected utility theory and discuss the influence of flexible price on the optimal quantity decision. Raz and Porteous (2006) analyze the joint price and quantity problem with a fractile approach, by which they show the method to compute the optimal price and quantity under general demand distribution. Deng and Yano (2006) consider the joint price and quantity decision with setup costs and capacity constraints over finite horizons. They characterize the optimal decisions and provide insights on the impact of setup costs and capacity restriction on the optimal policies. Some literature also studies the joint decision problem under multiple products assumption. Wang (2006) studies the case when there are n suppliers selling complementary products and making price and quantity decisions; and Karakul and Chan (2008) discuss the joint pricing and procurement problem with two product types (existing and new products) when the two products have downgrade substitution. The joint price quantity decision problem has also been studied under the context of supply chains. Based on more complex supply chain structure assumption, Wu et al. (2009) study the situation when two supply chains compete and simultaneously determine their price and quantity under demand uncertainty. Li and Atkins (2002) discuss the coordinating strategies between the marketing and operations departments. A simple linear transfer price strategy is studied and the misaligned incentives between the two departments are found to be the main reason for inefficiency. They also provide two ways of reducing this inefficiency. Unlike Li and Atkins (2002), we study the firm with well coordinated pricing and quantity decisions and we focus on the impact of information revelation and decision sequence choices on improving the performance instead of arrangement between departments. Also, we consider the sourcing risk while Li and Atkins (2002) does not. Another related work to ours is Li and Zheng (2006), which discuss the joint replenishment and pricing control with both demand risk and random yield. They analyze the simultaneous decisions under periodic review inventory system and provide the structural results on the optimal policy. Similarly, we show that the system with random yield always charges a higher price, i.e., the immediate cost effect mentioned in Li and Zheng (2006). Besides that, we analyze the benefit from flexible pricing in the simultaneous pricing case. And we further extend the model to study the sequential decision making scenarios and provide insights on the value of demand/yield information. There is also quite rich literature on the study of random yield. Yano and Lee (1995) provide a comprehensive review on the research topics related to random yield. Henig and Gerchak (1990) provide the structural result for inventory systems with random yield and stochastic demand. Based on Henig and Gerchak (1990), different extensions have been studied. Most research shows that yield randomness hurts the operations and reduces the firm's profit and for inventory systems, usually a threshold stocking policy is optimal. Erdem and Ozekici (2002) analyze a periodic review inventory system with random yield from the vendor's random capacity. Under deterministic demand assumption, Keren (2009) studies the single-period inventory problem with random yield under additive and multiplicative yield models. Also, a recent paper by Li et al. (2008) provides upper and lower bounds for the optimal stocking policy in the periodic review system with random yield and random demand. Recently, more research has focused on the random yield issue in different supply chain settings and the coordination issues in different supply chains with random yield. Gurnani et al. (2000), Gurnani and Gerchak (2007), and Guler and Bilgic (2009) study the coordination in different assembly systems with yield uncertainties of components. Abdel-Malek et al. (2008) model the capacitated newsboy problem and the scenarios studied can be well applied to different distribution systems with random yield settings. He and Zhang (2008) examine different random yield risk sharing contracts in a two-stage decentralized supply chain. Based on this paper, He and Zhang (2010) further analyze the joint effects of random yield and secondary market on supply chains. Wang (2009) discusses the coordination issue in a decentralized supply chain with random yield and random demand by using traditional and VMI arrangement. Kelle et al. (2009) study the buyer–supplier cooperation and negotiation when random yield exists. They study the effects of random yield on supplier and buyer policies and their bargaining process. Mukhopadhyay and Ma (2009) study the joint procurement and production decisions with both random yield and demand uncertainty. They analyze the purchasing and production decisions under three different assumptions on yield and lead time. Dadal and Alghalith (2009) discuss the production/quantity decision under random yield and price uncertainty. Xu (2010) considers using option contracts to manage the supply chain under random yield. Most of these papers focus on the optimal policy under random yield and a variety of assumptions. However, there is very sparse discussion on the relation between the random yield risk and demand risk. Heese (2007) finds that the inventory record inaccuracy, which can be viewed as one source of yield uncertainty, exacerbates the inefficiency caused by the double marginalization effect. In our paper, we not only provide the optimal price and quantity strategies under different scenario but also shed lights on the interaction between the risks from demand and supply. We find that, under certain parameter settings (usually when yield risk is relatively high), the double marginalization effect may be weakened by the reduction of random yield. This provides managers with additional incentives to reduce risks from the supply side since the impact from yield risk reduction will benefit both the operations and the marketing of the firm. Another focus of our paper is to study the effect of decision postponement and revelation of uncertainties. A recent paper by Li (2011) argues that relational benefits perceived by manufacturers will enable supply chain partners to achieve satisfaction; and this relational benefits enhance manufacturing firm's loyalty when making repurchasing decisions. Specifically in the supply chain management literature, research on different decision postponement and information revelation has been explored. Generally, the benefits from different postponement are shown in the stream of research. Anupindi and Jiang (2008) study competing firms under production postponement option and show the benefit of being flexible in production timing and observing the demand information. Van Mieghem and Dada (1999) discuss the effect of price postponement and production postponement on the firm's performance and give insights on the value of different postponement. Biller et al. (2006) study the benefit from price postponement on long term capacity decision and show that price postponement can lead to a large reduction in capacity investment and increase in profit. Tang and Yin (2007) discuss the responsive pricing and quantity decision under deterministic demand and random yield. Our paper further extends the model to stochastic demand. Granot and Yin (2008) study price and quantity decisions postponement in a decentralized supply chain under different scenarios like contract types, demand function forms, and sequences of decisions. They show that under most scenarios, most postponement is beneficial for the supply chain, while under some special circumstances, price and order postponement may hurt the chain. Our paper extends their results by incorporating the random yield risk from the supply side. Choi et al. (2008) discuss the supply risk information sharing with downstream partners in a decentralized system. Because of the price postponement and the information gain from the supply information revelation, the supply chain improves its performance, especially when the yield risk is high, which is also shown in our paper. Tomlin and Wang (2008) study a coproduction system with multiple products, which make price, production, downside conversion, and allocation decisions. They also consider the postponement of the price decision and the allocation rule and show the significant gains from price postponement compared with other options. Bakal and Akcali (2006) study a remanufacturing scenario with yield randomness and show the benefits of delaying price decision. Following this stream of research on operational and marketing decisions postponement, our paper discusses the joint price quantity decision under random yield and stochastic demand and addresses the postponement benefit in this setting. In particular, we show that the benefit from decision postponement is more significant when the risks are high. In general, this paper studies how the marketing and operations should cooperate under different scenarios. These scenarios depend on the characteristics of the product and the levels of the uncertainties from the supply side and the demand side. Here, we study and compare mainly two sequential decision making cases, the quantity postponement case and the price postponement case. Under both cases, we analyze the structural results from our model and illustrate the results with numerical examples. This paper contributes to the current literature in the following ways. First, we present the results on the effects of yield risk and market risk on the firm. Under these two uncertainties, we find that the reduction of the supply risk may result in increased expected output level. This finding provides evidence and support for operational risk reduction. Second, we extend the results from former literature on joint price quantity decision to more general scenarios under sequential decision cases in order to shed light on the value of decision postponement and the value of demand and supply risks reduction.
نتیجه گیری انگلیسی
In this paper, we address the problem on how the pricing decision and the quantity decision should cooperate under the influence of both supply and demand risks. In general, we find that the cooperation is necessary and beneficial to increase the firm's total profit. Under different sequence of decision and information revelation, we show the optimal pricing and operation decisions. Depending on the availability of price/quantity decision postponement, we study different scenarios and compare the results. With the numerical examples shown, we can see that sometimes reduction of the supply risk may cause increased input/output quantity, which provides support for operational risk reduction for enhancing single firm and even supply chain performances. We also find that price postponement gives the firm flexibility to adjust according to the realization of uncertainties and as either the supply uncertainty or the demand uncertainty increases, the firm benefits more and more from this postponement. Price postponement can achieve higher profit than quantity postponement under given market, but the relative advantage gradually reduces as firm reduces the supply risk. These results illustrate the necessity for the coordination between the operations and marketing department and provide ways to evaluate the cooperation. There are certain limitations with respect to our model presented here. The first is about the additive demand function assumption, it is reasonable to conjecture that the multiplicative demand model may yield the similar analytical results, which should be examined in details in future research. The additive demand function also affects some of our numerical results and contributes to the minor improvement on profit in Table 2. Also, the random yield model is still the traditional proportional stochastic yield model and the general yield model needs to be examined under the context of our model setting. Thirdly, although we provide some analytical results on how supply/risk affects the optimal decision based simple yield distributions as uniform distribution, it will be more interesting to explore other yield distributions. We used normal yield distribution in our numerical examples and in future research, we would like to further examine the results analytically.