دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی شماره 93915
ترجمه فارسی عنوان مقاله

یک مکانیسم هماهنگ سازی زنجیره تامین دو مرحله ای با توجه به تقاضای کم و تخفیف کم

عنوان انگلیسی
A two-stage supply chain coordination mechanism considering price sensitive demand and quantity discounts
کد مقاله سال انتشار تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی
93915 2018 30 صفحه PDF
منبع

Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)

Journal : European Journal of Operational Research, Volume 264, Issue 2, 16 January 2018, Pages 524-533

ترجمه کلمات کلیدی
هماهنگی زنجیره تامین، فهرست، مدل نظری بازی تقاضای حساس قیمت، تخفیف های کم
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی
Supply chain coordination; Inventory; Game theoretical model; Price sensitive demand; Quantity discounts;
پیش نمایش مقاله
پیش نمایش مقاله  یک مکانیسم هماهنگ سازی زنجیره تامین دو مرحله ای با توجه به تقاضای کم و تخفیف کم

چکیده انگلیسی

This paper explores the coordination between a supplier and a buyer within a decentralized supply chain, through the use of quantity discounts in a game theoretic model. Within this model, the players face inventory and pricing decisions. We propose both cooperative and non-cooperative approaches considering that the product traded experiences a price sensitive demand. In the first case, we study the dynamics of the game from the supplier's side as the leader in the negotiation obtaining a Stackelberg equilibrium, and then show how the payoff of this player could still improve from this point. In the second case, a cooperative model is formulated, where decisions are taken simultaneously, emulating a centralized firm, showing the benefits of the cooperation between the players. We further formulate a pricing game, where the buyer is allowed to set different prices to the final customer as a reaction to the supplier's discount decisions. For the latter we investigate the difference between feasibility of implementing a retail discount given a current coordination mechanism and without it. Finally the implications of transportation costs are analyzed in the quantity discount schedule. Our findings are illustrated with a numerical example showing the difference in the players’ payoff in each case and the optimal strategies, comparing in each case our results with existing work.