دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی شماره 142568
ترجمه فارسی عنوان مقاله

اثرات غربالگری برای چهره ها و اشیاء در پروستوپنگنسیس توسعه: یک سری از پرونده ها

عنوان انگلیسی
Inversion effects for faces and objects in developmental prosopagnosia: A case series analysis
کد مقاله سال انتشار تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی
142568 2018 36 صفحه PDF
منبع

Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)

Journal : Neuropsychologia, Volume 113, May 2018, Pages 52-60

ترجمه کلمات کلیدی
سزارین رشد تشخیص چهره، اثر تبدیل چهره، پردازش چهره جامع،
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی
Developmental prosopagnosia; Face recognition; Face inversion effect; Holistic face processing;
پیش نمایش مقاله
پیش نمایش مقاله  اثرات غربالگری برای چهره ها و اشیاء در پروستوپنگنسیس توسعه: یک سری از پرونده ها

چکیده انگلیسی

The disproportionate face inversion effect (dFIE) concerns the finding that face recognition is more affected by inversion than recognition of non-face objects; an effect assumed to reflect that face recognition relies on special operations. Support for this notion comes from studies showing that face processing in developmental prosopagnosia (DP) is less affected by inversion than it is in normal subjects, and that DPs may even display face inversion superiority effects, i.e. better processing of inverted compared to upright faces. To date, however, there are no reports of direct comparisons between inversion effects for faces and objects, investigating whether the altered inversion effect in DP is specific to faces. We examined this question by comparing inversion effects for faces and cars in two otherwise identical recognition tasks in a group of DPs (N = 16) and a matched control group, using a case series design. Although both groups showed inversion effects for both faces and cars, only the control group exhibited a significant dFIE, i.e. a larger inversion effect for faces than cars. In comparison, the DPs were not significantly more affected by inversion than the control group when assessed with a face processing task that did not require recognition. Importantly, in both settings the DPs are better with upright than with inverted faces, and on the individual level no DP was found to perform significantly better with inverted than with upright faces. In fact, the DPs are impaired relative to the control group with both upright and inverted faces and to a less extent also with upright and inverted cars. These results yield no evidence of inversion superiority in DP but rather suggest that their face recognition problem is not limited to operations specialized for upright faces.