انگیختگی ادراکی ایجاد حافظه های جدید اپیزودیک را بهبود می بخشد

Perhaps the best known and most influential of Jacques Derrida’s early, linguistically-oriented critiques concerns the relationship between writing and speech. This inquiry is directed towards a certain thread in the history of philosophy in which priority is given to spoken language over the written. It is Saussurean linguistics in particular that allows Derrida to posit the interdependence of phonocentrism, or the privilege of speech over writing, with logocentrism, or the desire for a true and universal experience of the world in the mind prior to the introduction of language. However, a close reading of this engagement suggests that Saussure might be phonocentric but not logocentric, and indeed, that it is possible to be phonocentric but not logocentric.

Perhaps the best known and most influential of Jacques Derrida’s early, linguistically-oriented critiques concerns the relationship between writing and speech. This inquiry – which features most centrally in Of Grammatology – is directed towards a certain thread in the history of philosophy in which priority is given to spoken language over the written. An essential proximity between the voice and the mind is always contrasted with the inessential and external quality of writing. For Derrida, the interiorisation of the voice and the exteriorisation of inscription is not an accident of history, but rather a necessary condition for metaphysics if it is to allow the mental, internal voice an immediate and pre-linguistic relationship with experience, nature, and the truth. This relationship between writing and speech would be established simultaneously with the birth of philosophy: