اثرات توجه به منابع غیر لیست در خطای حسی حافظه مک درموت-رویدگر-دیز

In the Deese–Roediger–McDermott (DRM) memory illusion participants indicate that nonpresented words were on a list that contained the word's associates. We compared standard DRM instructions with source-monitoring/strong-warning instructions that included both an example list and a source-monitoring test that allowed participants to identify nonstudy-list sources (Experiment 1: an associate of list words; Experiment 2a: generated by participants themselves) as the origin of words. In Experiment 2b source-monitoring instructions did not include a strong warning. In all experiments the DRM illusion in the source-monitoring/strong-warning or source-monitoring/no-strong-warning condition was reduced, but not eliminated, even with immediate testing. The illusion's robustness is discussed in terms of the source-monitoring framework.