دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی شماره 60006
ترجمه فارسی عنوان مقاله

پشیمانی قابل پیش بینی برای افزایش جذب غربالگری سرطان کولورکتال (مقالات): مطالعه کنترل شده تصادفی

عنوان انگلیسی
Anticipated regret to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening (ARTICS): A randomised controlled trial
کد مقاله سال انتشار تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی
60006 2015 10 صفحه PDF
منبع

Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)

Journal : Social Science & Medicine, Volume 142, October 2015, Pages 118–127

ترجمه کلمات کلیدی
سرطان روده بزرگ؛ غربالگری؛ پشیمانی قابل پیش بینی؛ آزمایش خون مخفی در مدفوع ؛ انزجار
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی
Colorectal cancer; Screening; Anticipated regret; Faecal occult blood test; Disgust
پیش نمایش مقاله
پیش نمایش مقاله  پشیمانی قابل پیش بینی برای افزایش جذب غربالگری سرطان کولورکتال (مقالات): مطالعه کنترل شده تصادفی

چکیده انگلیسی

Screening is important for early detection of colorectal cancer. Our aim was to determine whether a simple anticipated regret (AR) intervention could increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening. A randomised controlled trial of a simple, questionnaire-based AR intervention, delivered alongside existing pre-notification letters, was conducted. A total of 60,000 adults aged 50–74 years from the Scottish National Screening programme were randomised into the following groups: (1) no questionnaire (control), (2) Health Locus of Control questionnaire (HLOC) or (3) HLOC plus AR questionnaire. The primary outcome was return of the guaiac faecal occult blood test (FOBT). The secondary outcomes included intention to return test kit and perceived disgust (ICK). A total of 59,366 people were analysed as allocated (intention-to-treat (ITT)); no overall differences were seen between the treatment groups on FOBT uptake (control: 57.3%, HLOC: 56.9%, AR: 57.4%). In total, 13,645 (34.2%) individuals returned the questionnaires. Analysis of the secondary questionnaire measures showed that AR indirectly affected FOBT uptake via intention, whilst ICK directly affected FOBT uptake over and above intention. The effect of AR on FOBT uptake was also moderated by intention strength: for less-than-strong intenders only, uptake was 4.2% higher in the AR (84.6%) versus the HLOC group (80.4%) (95% CI for difference (2.0, 6.5)). The findings show that psychological concepts including AR and perceived disgust (ICK) are important factors in determining FOBT uptake. However, the AR intervention had no simple effect in the ITT analysis. It can be concluded that, in those with low intentions, exposure to AR may be required to increase FOBT uptake. The current controlled trials are presented at the website www.controlled-trials.com (number: ISRCTN74986452).