دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی شماره 70003
ترجمه فارسی عنوان مقاله

اثرات مشاوره داوطلبانه مبتنی بر خانه و تست بر آلودگی مرتبط با اچ آی وی: یافته های یک آزمایش تصادفی خوشه ای در زامبیا

عنوان انگلیسی
Effects of home-based Voluntary Counselling and Testing on HIV-related stigma: Findings from a cluster-randomized trial in Zambia
کد مقاله سال انتشار تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی
70003 2013 8 صفحه PDF
منبع

Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)

Journal : Social Science & Medicine, Volume 81, March 2013, Pages 18–25

ترجمه کلمات کلیدی
جنوب صحرای آفریقا، زامبیا، اچ آی وی / ایدز، استقامت، تبعیض رگرسیون خطی، محاکمه خوشه ای تصادفی داوطلب مشاوره و تست، مشاوره و آزمایش مبتنی بر خانه
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی
Sub-Saharan Africa; Zambia; HIV/AIDS; Stigma; Discrimination; Linear regression; Cluster-randomized trial; Voluntary Counselling and Testing; Home-based counselling and testing

چکیده انگلیسی

HIV-related stigma continues to be a prominent barrier to testing, treatment and care. However, few studies have investigated changes in stigma over time and the factors contributing to these changes, and there is no evidence of the impact of HIV testing and counselling on stigma. This study was nested within a pair-matched cluster-randomized trial on the acceptance of home-based voluntary HIV counselling and testing conducted in a rural district in Zambia between 2009 and 2011, and investigated changes in stigma over time and the impact of HIV testing and counselling on stigma. Data from a baseline survey (n = 1500) and a follow-up survey (n = 1107) were used to evaluate changes in stigma. There was an overall reduction of seven per cent in stigma from baseline to follow-up. This was mainly due to a reduction in individual stigmatizing attitudes but not in perceived stigma. The reduction did not differ between the trial arms (β = −0.22, p = 0.423). Being tested for HIV was associated with a reduction in stigma (β = −0.57, p = 0.030), and there was a trend towards home-based Voluntary Counselling and Testing having a larger impact on stigma than other testing approaches (β = −0.78, p = 0.080 vs. β = −0.37, p = 0.551), possibly explained by a strong focus on counselling and the safe environment of the home. The reduction observed in both arms may give reason to be optimistic as it may have consequences for disclosure, treatment access and adherence. Yet, the change in stigma may have been affected by social desirability bias, as extensive community mobilization was carried out in both arms. The study underscores the challenges in measuring and monitoring HIV-related stigma. Adjustment for social desirability bias and inclusion of qualitative methods are recommended for further studies on the impact of HIV testing on stigma.