دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی شماره 75881
ترجمه فارسی عنوان مقاله

کودکان مبتلا به فلج مغزی، اسپینا بیفیدا و اختلال زبان عملی: تفاوت ها و شباهت در توانایی عملی

عنوان انگلیسی
Children with cerebral palsy, spina bifida and pragmatic language impairment: Differences and similarities in pragmatic ability
کد مقاله سال انتشار تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی
75881 2009 10 صفحه PDF
منبع

Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)

Journal : Research in Developmental Disabilities, Volume 30, Issue 5, September–October 2009, Pages 942–951

ترجمه کلمات کلیدی
توانایی های عملی؛ توانایی های زبانی؛ توانایی های شناختی؛ مهارت های اساسی؛ ارزیابی اجتماعی و زبانی
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی
Pragmatic abilities; Linguistic abilities; Cognitive abilities; Underlying skills; Social versus linguistic assessment
پیش نمایش مقاله
پیش نمایش مقاله  کودکان مبتلا به فلج مغزی، اسپینا بیفیدا و اختلال زبان عملی: تفاوت ها و شباهت در توانایی عملی

چکیده انگلیسی

Pragmatically related abilities were studied in three clinical groups of children from 5 to 11 years of age; children with cerebral palsy (CP; n = 10), children with spina bifida and hydrocephalus (SBH; n = 10) and children with pragmatic language impairment (PLI; n = 10), in order to explore pragmatic abilities within each group. A range of pragmatic, linguistic and cognitive assessments were performed, and comparisons between the groups were made. In addition, connections between variables were studied. The most salient result was the many similarities and the lack of clear boundaries between the groups. The only significant differences found concerned short-term memory and inference ability, where all three groups experienced problems but to varying extent. Different patterns of variance were found in the groups, indicating that different underlying abilities such as reception of grammar, inferential comprehension and lexical comprehension seem to affect pragmatic ability in somewhat different ways. The results suggest that the children with CP and SBH in this study shared a number of pragmatically related traits, being more similar than would be expected according to earlier research. Finally, it is suggested that pragmatic assessment is further subdivided into a socially versus a linguistically related assessment.