دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی شماره 135035
ترجمه فارسی عنوان مقاله

یک ابزار طراحی برای ارزیابی تقاضای انرژی حرارتی و تاثیرات مالی و محیطی آن در محله

عنوان انگلیسی
A design tool to assess the heating energy demand and the associated financial and environmental impact in neighbourhoods
کد مقاله سال انتشار تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی
135035 2017 21 صفحه PDF
منبع

Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)

Journal : Energy and Buildings, Volume 152, 1 October 2017, Pages 516-523

ترجمه کلمات کلیدی
مدل سازی سه بعدی، مانع خورشیدی، هندسه ساختمان، روزهای درجه حرارت معادل پویا، ارزیابی چرخه زندگی زیست محیطی، هزینه چرخه زندگی،
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی
3D modelling; Solar obstructions; Building geometry; Dynamic Equivalent Heating Degree Days; Environmental Life Cycle Assessment; Life Cycle Costing;
پیش نمایش مقاله
پیش نمایش مقاله  یک ابزار طراحی برای ارزیابی تقاضای انرژی حرارتی و تاثیرات مالی و محیطی آن در محله

چکیده انگلیسی

This paper proposes a simple and accurate design tool to assess the solar gains and heating energy demand in buildings during the master planning phase of neighbourhoods. Detailed information on building geometry, constituting building elements and solar obstructions, is extracted from a 3D neighbourhood model using a plugin implemented in the modelling software SketchUp. This information is used to assess the heating energy demand of the buildings in the neighbourhood based on the dynamic Equivalent Heating Degree Day (dEHDD) method. Furthermore, the associated financial and environmental impacts are calculated based on an integrated life cycle approach, combining Life Cycle Costing (LCC) and Environmental Life Cycle Assessment (E-LCA) respectively. The design tool proposed is implemented for the Belgian context and used to analyse a number of schematic residential neighbourhood models with diverse built densities. The analysis reveals substantial differences in heating energy demand, life cycle financial and environmental costs. Neighbourhoods with a high built density and compact building types have a lower heating energy demand with potential reductions of up to 40% compared to neighbourhoods with a low built density and detached building types.