دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی شماره 63465
ترجمه فارسی عنوان مقاله

ویژگی های نوآوری و تصمیم گیری در مورد تصویب: دیدگاه رهبران نمونه ای ملی از سازمان های درمان اعتیاد

عنوان انگلیسی
Innovation Attributes and Adoption Decisions: Perspectives from Leaders of a National Sample of Addiction Treatment Organizations
کد مقاله سال انتشار تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی
63465 2015 7 صفحه PDF
منبع

Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)

Journal : Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, Volume 49, February 2015, Pages 1–7

ترجمه کلمات کلیدی
تصویب نوآوری، تئوری توزیع تصویب شیوه های مبتنی بر شواهد، سازمان های درمان اختلالات مصرف مواد
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی
Innovation adoption; Diffusion theory; Adoption of evidence-based practices; Substance use disorder treatment organizations

چکیده انگلیسی

Drawing on diffusion theory to further knowledge about evidence-based practices (EBPs) in the treatment of substance use disorders (SUDs), this study describes the perceived importance of innovation attributes in adoption decisions within a national sample of SUD treatment organizations. Face-to-face interviews were conducted with leaders of 307 organizations. A typology differentiated organizations reporting: (1) adoption of a treatment innovation in the past year (“recent adoption”), (2) plans to adopt an innovation in the upcoming year (“planned adoption”), or (3) no actual or planned adoption (“non-adoption”). About 30.7% of organizations reported recent adoption, 20.5% indicated planned adoption, and 48.8% were non-adopters. Leaders of organizations reporting recent adoption (n = 93) or planned adoption (n = 62) rated the importance of innovation attributes, including relative advantage, compatibility, complexity, and observability, on these adoption decisions using a Likert scale that ranged from 0 to 5. Innovation attributes most strongly endorsed were consistency with the program’s treatment philosophy (mean = 4.47, SD = 1.03), improvement in the program’s reputation with referral sources (mean = 4.00, SD = 1.33), reputational improvement with clients and their families (mean = 3.98, SD = 1.31), and reductions in treatment dropout (mean = 3.75, SD = 1.54). Innovation characteristics reflecting organizational growth and implementation costs were less strongly endorsed. Adopters and planners were generally similar in their importance ratings. There were modest differences in importance ratings when pharmacological innovations were compared to psychosocial interventions. These findings are consistent with diffusion theory and suggest that efforts to link EBPs with client satisfaction and potential reputational benefits may enhance the diffusion of EBPs. Attention to these attributes when developing and evaluating SUD treatment interventions may enhance efforts to increase subsequent adoption.