دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی شماره 136748
ترجمه فارسی عنوان مقاله

برنامه ریزی پروژه های ترکیبی و مشکل مرتب سازی مواد: الگوریتم های مدل سازی و راه حل

عنوان انگلیسی
A hybrid project scheduling and material ordering problem: Modeling and solution algorithms
کد مقاله سال انتشار تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی
136748 2017 28 صفحه PDF
منبع

Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)

Journal : Applied Soft Computing, Volume 58, September 2017, Pages 700-713

ترجمه کلمات کلیدی
سفارش مواد، برنامه ریزی پروژه چند حالته الگوریتم تکاملی چند هدفه، مرز پارتو، تخفیف کم حجم،
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی
Material ordering; Multi-mode project scheduling; Multi-objective evolutionary algorithms; Pareto frontier; Total quantity discount;
پیش نمایش مقاله
پیش نمایش مقاله  برنامه ریزی پروژه های ترکیبی و مشکل مرتب سازی مواد: الگوریتم های مدل سازی و راه حل

چکیده انگلیسی

A novel combination of a multimode project scheduling problem with material ordering, in which material procurements are exposed to the total quantity discount policy is investigated in this paper. The study aims at finding an optimal Pareto frontier for a triple objective model derived for the problem. While the first objective minimizes the makespan of the project, the second objective maximizes the robustness of the project schedule and finally the third objective minimizes the total costs pertaining to renewable and nonrenewable resources involved in a project. Four well-known multi-objective evolutionary algorithms including non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGAII), strength Pareto evolutionary algorithm II (SPEAII), multi objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO), and multi objective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition (MOEAD) solve the developed triple-objective problem. The parameters of algorithms are tuned by the response surface methodology. The algorithms are carried out on a set of benchmarks and are compared based on five performance metrics evaluating their efficiencies in terms of closeness to the optimal frontier, diversity, and variance of results. Finally, a statistical assessment is conducted to analyze the results obtained by the algorithms. Results show that the NSGAII considerably outperforms others in 4 out of 5 metrics and the MOPSO performs better in terms of the remaining metric.