دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی شماره 41931
ترجمه فارسی عنوان مقاله

بانک مرکزی و تنظیمات نامتقارن: استفاده از برآوردگر غربال برای ایالات متحده آمریکا و برزیل

عنوان انگلیسی
Central bank and asymmetric preferences: An application of sieve estimators to the U.S. and Brazil
کد مقاله سال انتشار تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی
41931 2015 12 صفحه PDF
منبع

Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)

Journal : Economic Modelling, Volume 51, December 2015, Pages 72–83

ترجمه کلمات کلیدی
سیاست های پولی - ترجیحات بانک مرکزی - اولویت های نامتقارن - برآوردگر غربال
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی
Monetary policy; Central bank's preference; Asymmetric preferences; Sieve estimators
پیش نمایش مقاله
پیش نمایش مقاله  بانک مرکزی و تنظیمات نامتقارن: استفاده از برآوردگر غربال برای ایالات متحده آمریکا و برزیل

چکیده انگلیسی

Whether central banks place the same weights on positive and negative deviations of inflation and of the output gap from their respective targets is an interesting question regarding monetary policy. The literature has sought to address this issue using a specific asymmetric function, the so-called Linex loss function. However, is the Linex an actually asymmetric specification? In an attempt to answer this question, we applied the sieve estimation method, a fully nonparametric approach, in which the result could be any proper loss function. This way, our results could corroborate the quadratic or Linex loss functions used in the literature or suggest an entirely new function. We applied the sieve estimation method to the United States and to Brazil, an emergent country which has consistently followed an inflation targeting regime. The economy was modeled with forward-looking agents and central bank commitment. Our results indicate that the FED was more concerned with inflation rates below the target, but no asymmetry was found in the inflation–output process in the Volcker–Greenspan period. As to Brazil, we found asymmetries in output gaps from 2004 onwards, when the Brazilian Central Bank was more concerned with positive output gaps; but we did not find any statistically significant asymmetries in inflation.