نفوذ در MNEs 'سازمان های غیر دولتی استراتژی های توسعه اجتماعی در زمینه های نهادی متفاوت: چشم انداز هزینه های معامله
|کد مقاله||سال انتشار||تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی||ترجمه فارسی|
|17294||2009||11 صفحه PDF||سفارش دهید|
نسخه انگلیسی مقاله همین الان قابل دانلود است.
هزینه ترجمه مقاله بر اساس تعداد کلمات مقاله انگلیسی محاسبه می شود.
این مقاله تقریباً شامل 7609 کلمه می باشد.
هزینه ترجمه مقاله توسط مترجمان با تجربه، طبق جدول زیر محاسبه می شود:
|شرح||تعرفه ترجمه||زمان تحویل||جمع هزینه|
|ترجمه تخصصی - سرعت عادی||هر کلمه 90 تومان||12 روز بعد از پرداخت||684,810 تومان|
|ترجمه تخصصی - سرعت فوری||هر کلمه 180 تومان||6 روز بعد از پرداخت||1,369,620 تومان|
Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)
Journal : International Business Review, Volume 18, Issue 5, October 2009, Pages 446–456
In this paper, we examine the effect of nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) on the transaction costs multinational enterprises (MNEs) assume in their nonmarket social development strategies. We develop propositions to predict the effect of three important aspects of the institutional context on how NGOs affect MNE transaction costs: institutional development, institutional distance and institutional dynamism. We also propose how these relationships are moderated by the level of civil society development in the countries in which these entities interact. We conclude with suggestions for further research.
Multinational enterprises (MNEs) are under increasing pressure to ensure a high degree of social responsibility in their operations, throughout the value chain and across the globe. Nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), whose influence on international business has risen in recent years (Teegen, Doh, & Vachani, 2004), act as agents of civil society and pressure MNEs to respond to demands for socially responsible strategies by affecting their transaction costs and choice of governance mechanisms. The evolving institutional context poses challenges for MNEs, inducing organizational transformation that includes changing the company's posture toward social issues. A relatively well-established research stream has examined firm strategies in the “nonmarket” environment (Bonardi and Keim, 2005, Bonardi et al., 2005, Baron, 1995 and Baron, 2000). Only recently, however, has this research extended to the realm of NGOs (Doh and Guay, 2004, Doh and Guay, 2006 and Teegen et al., 2004). It is especially important to understand the effect on transaction costs since they lie at the core of theoretical explanations for the existence of MNEs, and their strategic choices with regard to governance mechanisms (Buckley and Casson, 1976, Dunning, 1988, Hennart, 1982, Hymer, 1960 and Rugman, 1981). In this paper, we apply the TCE framework to examine how NGOs’ actions affect MNEs’ transaction costs, which vary with level and posture of MNEs’ social development strategy and institutional context. The following five sections are organized as follows. The first section summarizes the TCE framework; the second section discusses categories of MNEs’ social development strategies; the third section examines the impact of NGOs on transaction costs; the fourth section develops propositions regarding how NGOs’ effect of MNEs’ transaction costs varies with institutional development, distance and dynamism; and the fifth section provides concluding remarks and discusses theoretical implications.
نتیجه گیری انگلیسی
Drawing from and extending the TCE framework, we have shown how NGOs affect the transaction costs associated with MNEs’ social development strategies, especially in host-country institutional contexts that differ significantly from homecountry contexts. NGOs can force companies to recognize their negative externalities and develop essential social development strategies to attenuate them. In addition, NGOs can help firms design and implement enhanced social development strategies, reducing their transaction costs. At the same time, however, NGOs can undermine MNE strategies by increasing transaction costs, exposing inferior or symbolic gestures that lack substance, and by targeting those firms that claim to adhere to high levels of social responsibility but fail to deliver.