رابطه بین قیمت لحظه ای نفت خام و قیمت های آینده : نظریه علیت هم انباشتگی، خطی و غیر خطی
|کد مقاله||سال انتشار||تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی||ترجمه فارسی|
|15678||2008||13 صفحه PDF||سفارش دهید|
نسخه انگلیسی مقاله همین الان قابل دانلود است.
هزینه ترجمه مقاله بر اساس تعداد کلمات مقاله انگلیسی محاسبه می شود.
این مقاله تقریباً شامل 7518 کلمه می باشد.
هزینه ترجمه مقاله توسط مترجمان با تجربه، طبق جدول زیر محاسبه می شود:
- تولید محتوا با مقالات ISI برای سایت یا وبلاگ شما
- تولید محتوا با مقالات ISI برای کتاب شما
- تولید محتوا با مقالات ISI برای نشریه یا رسانه شما
پیشنهاد می کنیم کیفیت محتوای سایت خود را با استفاده از منابع علمی، افزایش دهید.
Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)
Journal : Energy Economics, Volume 30, Issue 5, September 2008, Pages 2673–2685
The present study investigates the linear and nonlinear causal linkages between daily spot and futures prices for maturities of one, two, three and four months of West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil. The data cover two periods October 1991–October 1999 and November 1999–October 2007, with the latter being significantly more turbulent. Apart from the conventional linear Granger test we apply a new nonparametric test for nonlinear causality by Diks and Panchenko after controlling for cointegration. In addition to the traditional pairwise analysis, we test for causality while correcting for the effects of the other variables. To check if any of the observed causality is strictly nonlinear in nature, we also examine the nonlinear causal relationships of VECM filtered residuals. Finally, we investigate the hypothesis of nonlinear non-causality after controlling for conditional heteroskedasticity in the data using a GARCH-BEKK model. Whilst the linear causal relationships disappear after VECM cointegration filtering, nonlinear causal linkages in some cases persist even after GARCH filtering in both periods. This indicates that spot and futures returns may exhibit asymmetric GARCH effects and/or statistically significant higher order conditional moments. Moreover, the results imply that if nonlinear effects are accounted for, neither market leads or lags the other consistently, videlicet the pattern of leads and lags changes over time.
The role of futures markets in providing an efficient price discovery mechanism has been an area of extensive empirical research. Several studies have dealt with the lead–lag relationships between spot and futures prices of commodities with the objective of investigating the issue of market efficiency. Garbade and Silber (1983) first presented a model to examine the price discovery role of futures prices and the effect of arbitrage on price changes in spot and futures markets of commodities. The Garbade–Silber model was applied to the feeder cattle market by Oellermann et al. (1989) and to the live hog commodity market by Schroeder and Goodwin (1991), while a similar study by Silvapulle and Moosa (1999) examined the oil market. Bopp and Sitzer (1987) tested the hypothesis that futures prices are good predictors of spot prices in the heating oil market, while Serletis and Banack (1990), Cologni and Manera (2008) and Chen and Lin (2004) tested for market efficiency using cointegration analysis. Crowder and Hamed (1993) and Sadorsky (2000) also used cointegration to test the simple efficiency hypothesis and the arbitrage condition for crude oil futures. Finally, Schwarz and Szakmary (1994) examined the price discovery process in the markets of crude and heating oil. The recent empirical evidence on causality is invariably based on the Granger test (Granger, 1969). The conventional approach of testing for Granger causality is to assume a parametric linear, time series model for the conditional mean. Although it requires the linearity assumption this approach is appealing, since the test reduces to determining whether the lags of one variable enter into the equation for another variable. Moreover, tests based on residuals will be sensitive only to causality in the conditional mean while covariables may influence the conditional distribution of the response in nonlinear ways. Baek and Brock (1992) noted that parametric linear Granger causality tests have low power against certain nonlinear alternatives. Recent work has revealed that nonlinear structure indeed exists in spot and futures returns. These nonlinearities are normally attributed to nonlinear transaction cost functions, the role of noise traders, and to market microstructure effects (Abhyankar, 1996, Chen and Lin, 2004 and Silvapulle and Moosa, 1999). In view of this, nonparametric techniques are appealing because they place direct emphasis on prediction without imposing a linear functional form. Various nonparametric causality tests have been proposed in the literature. The test by Hiemstra and Jones (1994), which is a modified version of the Baek and Brock (1992) test, is regarded as a test for a nonlinear dynamic causal relationship between a pair of variables. The Hiemstra and Jones test relaxes Baek and Brock's assumption that the time series to which the test is applied are mutually and individually independent and identically distributed. Instead, it allows each series to display weak (or short-term) temporal dependence. When applied to the residuals of vector autoregressions, the Hiemstra and Jones test is intended to determine whether nonlinear dynamic relations exist between variables by testing whether the past values influence present and future values. However, Diks and Panchenko, 2005 and Diks and Panchenko, 2006 demonstrate that the relationship tested by Hiemstra and Jones test is not generally compatible with Granger causality, leading to the possibility of spurious rejections of the null hypothesis. As an alternative Diks and Panchenko (2006) developed a new test statistic that overcomes these limitations. Empirically it is important to take into account the possible effects of cointegration on both linear and nonlinear Granger causality tests. Controlling for cointegration is necessary because it affects the specification of the model used for causality testing. If the series are cointegrated, then causality testing should be based on a Vector Error Correction model (VECM) rather than an unrestricted VAR model (Engle and Granger, 1987). When cointegration is not modelled, evidence may vary significantly towards detecting linear and nonlinear causality between the predictor variables. Specifically, the absence of cointegration could mean the violation of the necessary condition for the simple efficiency hypothesis (Dwyer and Wallace, 1992), which implies that the futures price is not an unbiased predictor of the spot price at maturity. This implies an absence of a long-run relationship between spot and futures prices, as it was reported in works of Choudhury (1991), Krehbiel and Adkins (1993), Crowder and Hamed (1993). Alternatively, based on the cost-of-carry relationship, a failure to find cointegration may be attributed to the nonstationarity of the other components of this relationship such as the interest rate or the convenience yield (Moosa and Al-Loughani, 1995 and Moosa, 1996). The aim of the present study is to test for the existence of linear and nonlinear causal lead–lag relationships between spot and futures prices of West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil, which is used as an indicator of world oil prices and is the underlying commodity of New York Mercantile Exchange's (NYMEX) oil futures contracts. We apply a three-step empirical framework for examining dynamic relationships between spot and futures prices. First, we explore nonlinear and linear dynamic linkages applying the nonparametric Diks–Panchenko causality test, and after controlling for cointegration, a parametric linear Granger causality test. In the second step, after filtering the return series using the properly specified VAR or VECM model, the series of residuals are examined by the nonparametric Diks–Panchenko causality test. In addition to applying the usual bivariate VAR or VECM model to each pair of time series, we also consider residuals of a full five-variate model to account for the possible effect of the other variables. This step ensures that any remaining causality is strictly nonlinear in nature, as the VAR or VECM model has already purged the residuals of linear dependence. Finally, in the last step, we investigate the null hypothesis of nonlinear non-causality after controlling for conditional heteroskedasticity in the data using a GARCH-BEKK model, again both in a bivariate and in a five-variate representation. Our approach incorporates the entire variance–covariance structure of the spot and future prices interrelationship. The empirical methodology employed with the multivariate GARCH-BEKK model can not only help to understand the short-run movements, but also explicitly capture the volatility persistence mechanism. Improved knowledge of the direction and nature of causality and interdependence between the spot and futures markets, and consequently the degree of their integration, will expand the information set available to policymakers, international portfolio managers and multinational corporations for decision-making. The remainder of the paper is organized as follows. Section 2 provides an introduction to the theoretical considerations and existing empirical evidence on the relationship between spot and futures prices. Section 3 briefly reviews the linear Granger causality framework and provides a description of the Diks–Panchenko nonparametric test for nonlinear Granger causality. Section 4 describes the data used and Section 5 presents the results. Section 6 concludes with a summary and suggestions for future research.
نتیجه گیری انگلیسی
In the present paper we investigated the existence of linear and nonlinear causal relationships between the daily spot and futures prices for maturities of one, two, three and four months of West Texas Intermediate (WTI), which is the underlying commodity of New York Mercantile Exchange's (NYMEX) oil futures contracts. The data covered two separate periods, namely PI: 10/21/1991–10/29/1999 and PII: 11/1/ 1999–10/30/2007, with the latter being significantly more turbulent. The study contributed to the literature on the lead–lag relationships between the spot and futures markets in several ways. In particular, it was shown that the pairwise VECM modeling suggested a strong bi-directional Granger causality between spot and futures prices in both periods, whereas the five-variate implementation resulted in a uni-directional causal linkage fromspot to futures prices only in PII. This empirical evidence appears to be in contrast to the results of Silvapulle and Moosa (1999) on the futures to spot prices uni-directional relationship. Additionally, whilst the linear causal relationships have disappeared after the cointegration filtering, nonlinear causal linkages in some cases were revealed and more importantly persisted even after multivariate GARCH filtering during both periods. Interestingly, it was shown that the five-variate implementation of the GARCH-BEKK filtering, as opposed to the bi-variate, captured the volatility transmission mechanism more effectively and removed the nonlinear causality due to second moment spillover effects. Moreover, the results imply that if nonlinear effects are accounted for, neither market leads or lags the other consistently, or in other words the pattern of leads and lags changes over time. Given that causality can vary from one direction to the other at any point in time, a finding of bi-directional causality over the sample period may be taken to imply a changing pattern of leads and lags over time, providing support to the Kawaller et al. (1988) hypothesis. According to that hypothesis, market participants filter information relevant to their positions as new information arrives and, at any time point, spotmay lead futures and vice versa. Hence it can be safely concluded that, although in theory the futures market play a bigger role in the price discovery process, the spot market also plays an important role in this respect. The empirical evidence of a causal linkage from spot to futures prices can be attributed to the sequence of actions taken from the three market participants following a spot price change, as described in the Moosa model (1996). In that, arbitrageurs respond to the violation of the cost-of-carry condition and then speculators acting upon the expected spot price will revise their expectation. In the same way, speculators who act upon the expected futures price will revise their expectation and react to the disparity between current and expected futures prices. These conclusions, apart from offering a much better understanding of the dynamic linear and nonlinear relationships underlying the crude oil spot and futures markets, may have important implications for market efficiency. For instance, they may be useful in future research to quantify the process of market integration or may influence the greater predictability of these markets. An interesting subject for future research is the nature and source of the nonlinear causal linkages. As presented, volatility effects may partly account for nonlinear causality. The GARCH-BEKK model partially captured the nonlinearity in daily spot and future returns, but only in some cases. An explanation could be that spot and futures returns may exhibit statistically significant higher-order moments. A similar result was reported by Scheinkman and LeBaron, (1989) for stock returns. Alternatively, parameterized asymmetric multivariate GARCH models could be employed in order to accommodate the asymmetric impact of unconditional shocks on the conditional variances.