ابزار مدیریت تامین کننده هوشمند برای تعیین معیار تامین کنندگان در برون سپاری تولید
|کد مقاله||سال انتشار||تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی||ترجمه فارسی|
|19100||2002||12 صفحه PDF||سفارش دهید|
نسخه انگلیسی مقاله همین الان قابل دانلود است.
هزینه ترجمه مقاله بر اساس تعداد کلمات مقاله انگلیسی محاسبه می شود.
این مقاله تقریباً شامل 7028 کلمه می باشد.
هزینه ترجمه مقاله توسط مترجمان با تجربه، طبق جدول زیر محاسبه می شود:
|شرح||تعرفه ترجمه||زمان تحویل||جمع هزینه|
|ترجمه تخصصی - سرعت عادی||هر کلمه 90 تومان||11 روز بعد از پرداخت||632,520 تومان|
|ترجمه تخصصی - سرعت فوری||هر کلمه 180 تومان||6 روز بعد از پرداخت||1,265,040 تومان|
Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)
Journal : Expert Systems with Applications, Volume 22, Issue 3, April 2002, Pages 213–224
A global corporation's supply chain usually consists of enterprises and manufacturers that are graphically dispersed around the world, whereby each company is involved in a wide variety of supply chain activities such as order fulfillment, international procurement, acquisition of information technology, manufacturing, and customer service. However, selecting suppliers based on accumulated experience is not both effective and scientific due to subjective judgment and lack of systematic analysis. Therefore, continuously tracking and benchmarking performance of suppliers and forming an appropriate supplier selection mechanism is one of the crucial activities in supply chain management. This paper presents an intelligent supplier management tool (ISMT) using the case-based reasoning (CBR) and neural network (NN) techniques to select and benchmark suppliers. The development of ISMT and how the CBR and NN techniques are used in benchmarking suppliers during the process of new product development in Honeywell Consumer Products (Hong Kong) Limited are presented.
The intense global competition among manufacturing industries to co-ordinate and respond quickly the industry value chain from suppliers to customers has made supplier management an important tool in new business design. It is because in the last decade, the role of manufacturing has shifted from a producer of goods and services to one that co-ordinates the whole industry value chain. Very few manufacturers now own all of the activities along the chain but integrate the supply network from various suppliers to the final customer. The possession of knowledge and information of the supplier networks and the ability to make fast and accurate decision often constitute a competitive advantage compared with his competitors or other networks. The rapid advance in information technology is now deployed not only to improve existing operational effectiveness of a business, but also to build the new capability to meet today's business environment and complexity. Among the many desirable capabilities, the ability to learn and adapt to changes is essential. Consequently, the core activity of manufacturing is no longer confined to making things but lies in the systematic processing of knowledge to create value for customers. Manufacturing-related business services that capitalize on Internet and information technologies are expanding fast. As the manufacturing industry is gradually moving towards a borderless business environment, new models for manufacturing co-operation and collaboration through networks to meet the imminent challenge in the increasingly competitive marketplace is on the horizon. Ferdows (1989) defined the international manufacturing system as a network of factories. Each factory plays different strategic roles in the network, e.g. off-shore, source, server, contributor, outpost and lead. The focus of Ferdows was on the relation between network and its factories. He tried to link the strategic motivations to the role of each factory in a network and emphasized new opportunities for learning in the network. However, this model perhaps put a little too much emphasis on strategic role of separate factories rather than functions of the integrated or coordinated network. Cohen, Fisher, and Jaikumar (1989) considered the network including vendors, plants and markets, but their international manufacturing strategy was mainly driven by the international financial factors, such as fluctuations of currency exchange rate. Moran and Riesenberger (1994) found that while globalization has intensified competition among enterprises, it has also fragmented production systems everywhere. There is a tendency for large firms to evolve into loosely tied and decentralized federations or business units, making products and seeking alliances both within and outside the ‘consortium’ to serve customers' demands to their best ability. Therefore, it can be summarized that the driving forces of the global market opportunity and new patterns of competition required a new generation of networks to be developed as manufacturing business is developed globally. In recent years, a number of global manufacturing networks have been established, taking advantage of fast-growing networking and information technologies (Shi, Gregory, & Naylor, 1997). The networking characteristics of the new manufacturing system concern the involvement of manufacturers in a wide perspective covering geographic dispersed and interdependent parties in order to response rapidly to the demand of market. Therefore, an outsource manufacturing system consists of firms that are geographically dispersed and do not belong to the same Head Company. It is a system with central management capability, possessing the ability of central task decomposition/allocation, co-ordination and monitoring (Lee et al., 1998, Lee and Lau, 1999a, Choy and Lee, 2000 and Choy and Lee, 2001). In addition, to many companies, the Internet provides a global link to the company's customers and suppliers (Kalakota, 1997, Mill, 1998 and Collet, 1999). With the rapid advances of electronic and communication technologies, an outsource manufacturing system that shares the information and resources among loosely connected manufacturing firms can be realized. The idea of forming an outsource manufacturing system is meant to establish a dynamic organization through the synergetic combination of dissimilar companies with different core competencies, thereby forming an organization to perform a given business project to achieve maximum degree of customer satisfaction (Goranson, 1999, Gilman et al., 1997 and Westkamper and Tutsch, 1998). Customers and suppliers can directly access the company almost at any place and at any time in the world for acquiring useful information (Lee, 1997 and Lee and Lau, 1999a). In particular, the process of searching for the appropriate partners/suppliers and the continuous assessment of performance of these companies for a certain type of business task is of crucial importance to the successful running of an outsource manufacturing system. In this aspect, it is important that a certain level of decision support functionality should be created to enhance the overall performance of the system. On the other hand, although it is a global trend to virtually integrate suppliers, manufacturers and end-customers in the supply chain basing on a certain type of virtual enterprise architecture (Ouzounis & Tschammer, 1999), the supply chain of products or services for a corporation can be very complex. A global corporation's supply chain now usually consists of multiple enterprises graphically dispersed around the world and each of these enterprises is involved in a wide variety of supply chain activities—order fulfillment, international procurement, acquisition of new information technology, and customer service. There are complex relationships such as multiple suppliers serving multiple customers, or a supplier who may be a customer or even a competitor in different parts of the chain (Christopher and Towill, 2000 and Weber, 2000). According to Carter et al. (2000), the future of purchasing and supply strategic directions are that: (1) supplier assessment and evaluation will become more detailed and precise; (2) companies will create supply strategies to achieve cost and technology advantages; (3) dominant supply chain players will increase sourcing influence at the design and development stage. What manufacturers do is looking to establish dynamic trading relationships. It, however, needs a tool to select potential supplier(s) with the capability of continually monitoring and assessing the performance of their suppliers (Liu et al., 2000 and Radjou, 2000). Manufacturers should use this extended supply chain visibility to identify and cut ties with low performance suppliers. Therefore, continuously tracking performance of supply chain partners and forming a supplier selection mechanism are expected as one of the crucial sessions in supply chain management. Benchmarking, one the other hand, is the systematic comparison of elements of performance in a company against those best practices of relevant companies, obtaining information that will help the observing company to identify and implement improvement. Bhutta and Huq (1999) identified seven types of benchmarking based on what is compared, such as performance, process, and strategic benchmarking, and what the comparison is being made against, such as internal, competitive, functional and generic benchmarking. In fact, performance measurement in benchmarking is a trend measurement and comparison with another companies. In the past, researchers have conducted studies to identify the criteria for enterprise performance benchmarking (Rolstadås, 1998) in terms of people, customer, financial, learning and innovation. However, the results from these researches indicated that there is a lack of findings related to the implementation of a system, which is able to provide a reliable, and systematic benchmarking assessment approach to support supplier selection. Burns, 1997 and Meziane et al., 2000 proposed that artificial intelligence (AI) technique brings the efficiency and flexibility needed by manufacturing system. Mclvor and Humphreys (2000) prompted that it is effective in the decision making in make or buy methodology and practice with the use of AI techniques such as the case-based reasoning (CBR) technique, while other researchers have adopted fuzzy set, statistical model, expert systems and neural networks (NN) to aid in the process of supplier selection (Nguyen, 1985, Vokurka et al., 1996 and Ng et al., 1998). However, each of these systems has their own disadvantages such as the difficulties in defining the rules for expert system approach and the membership functions of the fuzzy set theory. In order to benchmark suppliers during the supplier selection process in a global aspect, an intelligent supplier management tool (ISMT) using CBR and NN techniques for outsource manufacturing is discussed in this paper. ISMT, which was firstly proposed as a task allocation tool (Choy & Lee, 2000), and later as a decision support tool in a multi-agent based virtual enterprise architecture (Choy & Lee, 2001), can help decision makers in benchmarking suppliers as well as making effective decisions about suppliers or partners when forming a supplier chain among companies, or evaluating potential suppliers to outsource certain activities to gain a competitive advantage. By doing so, important supplier information in the form of network intelligence is developed and acquired. This paper is divided into six sections. Section 2 is the introduction of CBR and NN techniques. Section 3 is the literature review in the area of supplier selection. Section 4 is the development of ISMT using the hybrid CBR/NN technique for benchmarking suppliers. Section 5 is a case study of Honeywell on how ISMT is used in selecting and benchmarking suppliers during the new product development process while a conclusion of using ISMT as a supplier selection system in general is made in Section 7.
نتیجه گیری انگلیسی
In this paper, an ISMT, for selecting and benchmarking suppliers under outsource manufacturing environment is introduced. ISMT aims to improve the current practice of suppliers selection, adopting the computational intelligence technologies into the traditional supplier selection process with the assimilation of case-base reasoning and neural network to form the integrated part for the evaluation of potential suppliers prior to final decision. In general, ISMT captures the knowledge of potential suppliers with the support of CBRM, which performs analysis to find matched candidates and provides information on projected performance of them through a benchmarking process using a trained neural network, NNE, which learns through past experience. This approach is favorable to the progressive injection of intelligence to ISMT through the embraced machine learning capability, the result of which is to support the decision-making process in benchmarking suppliers in outsource manufacturing.